Davis v. Williams et al
Filing
6
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER, 5 . Signed on 5/10/19 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Matthes Mitra, Renea) Copy mailed on 5/10/2019 to Nicole Davis, 3918 Wabash Ave, Kansas City MO 64130 (Houston, Kiambu).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
WESTERN DIVISION
NICOLE DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JOHN L. WILLIAMS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:18-CV-435-ODS
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER
On June 11, 2018, the Court denied Plaintiff application for leave to file an action
without paying the filing fee, denied her motion for appointment of counsel, and dismissed
the matter without prejudice. Doc. #4. On May 3, 2019, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to
Reconsider,” which, in its entirety, states: “Exhibit 1-3 copy of letters altered(?) or falsely
drawn to cover up the many discrimination(?) against several enitities and after giving a
letter refused to purse do to conflict of personal relationships as indicated Exhibit 1 was
original communactions Exhibit 2, 3, are my first time having knowledge of such
communactions.” Doc. #5, at 1. Plaintiff attaches letters she presumably received from
the Kansas City, Missouri Human Relations Department regarding her complaint(s) against
Emmanuel Dace, Swope Community Builders, MCED, Metropolitan Community, and
Fantasy Homes. Doc. #5, at 2-4.
A motion to reconsider is “granted only in exceptional circumstances requiring
extraordinary relief.” Minn. Supply Co. v. Raymond Corp., 472 F.3d 524, 534 (8th Cir.
2006). In her filing, Plaintiff fails to address the deficiencies the Court previously noted.
She does not clarify the claims she attempts to bring, identify a basis for the Court’s
jurisdiction, or provide sufficient facts to support the possible claims mentioned in the
Court’s Order denying her initial motion. Accordingly, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion to
reconsider.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: May 10, 2019
/s/ Ortrie D. Smith
ORTRIE D. SMITH, SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?