Pope v. Temp-Con, LLC
ORDER dismissing without prejudice 9 motion to dismiss case; dismissing without prejudice 9 motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; dismissing without prejudice 10 motion to remand; granting 12 motion to remand. Signed on 9/10/2020 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
STEPHEN H. POPE,
Case No. 4:20-CV-00587-DGK
ORDER REMANDING CASE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
This case arises out of an allegation by Plaintiff Stephen H. Pope that Defendant TempCon, LLC wrongfully discharged him. Plaintiff initially filed his complaint in state court, and
Defendant timely removed to this Court (Doc. 1). Now before the Court is the parties’ joint motion
for remand for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (Doc. 12). Their motion is GRANTED.
As a federal court of limited jurisdiction, this Court may only hear cases properly before
it. Under 18 U.S. § 1332(a)(1), a federal court may hear a case when the parties are “citizens of
different states” and the “matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of
interest and costs.” The party invoking federal jurisdiction bears the burden of affirmatively
establishing it. See Bell v. Hershey Co., 557 F.3d 953, 956 (8th Cir. 2009). A wrongfully removed
case must be remanded “if it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.” In re
Prempro Prods. Liab. Litig., 591 F.3d 613, 620 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)).
At the time of removal, Defendant alleged this case was properly before the court because
the parties were diverse and the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000. Upon further
consideration, however, the parties assert they are not diverse as both are citizens of the state of
Case 4:20-cv-00587-DGK Document 13 Filed 09/10/20 Page 1 of 2
Missouri. This lack of diversity between the parties strips this Court of jurisdiction. Thus, this
case is REMANDED, and all pending motions are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: September 10, 2020
/s/ Greg Kays
GREG KAYS, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 4:20-cv-00587-DGK Document 13 Filed 09/10/20 Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?