Curtis v. Baker et al

Filing 71

ORDER re 66 Plaintiff's motion for subpoenas. For each witness Plaintiff would like for the Court to issue a subpoena, Plaintiff should summarize the anticipated testimony of the witness and explain how this testimony is relevant to a materi al fact in dispute. Plaintiff shall file this information on or before July 21, 2011. Defendant will then have fourteen (14) days to respond. Defendant shall include in his response any witness they will make available for trial, eliminating the need for a subpoena to be issued. Signed on 7/1/11 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Francis, Alexandra)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
ST. JOSEPH DIVISION
LARRY GENE CURTIS,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
CO I BAKER,
Defendant.

Case No. 09-06098-CV-SJ-DGK

ORDER
Pending before the Court are several filings from Plaintiff requesting subpoenas be issued for
trial compelling the appearance of certain witnesses (docs. 66 - 70). The Court would like to review
additional information from the parties before it issues any subpoenas. For each witness Plaintiff
would like for the Court to issue a subpoena, Plaintiff should summarize the anticipated testimony of
the witness and explain how this testimony is relevant to a material fact in dispute. Plaintiff shall
file this information on or before July 21, 2011.
Defendant will then have fourteen (14) days to respond. Defendant shall include in his
response any witness they will make available for trial, eliminating the need for a subpoena to be
issued.
/s/ Greg Kays
GREG KAYS, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DATED: July 1, 2011