Davis et al v. Buchanan County, Missouri et al
Filing
851
JUDGMENT entered by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Signed on 6/8/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Vandegriff, Joseph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
BRENDA DAVIS and
FREDERICK STUFFLEBEAN,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
BUCHANAN COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:17-CV-06058-CV-SJ-NKL
ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENTS AND REGARDING DISTRIBUTION OF
SETTLEMENT FUNDS PURSUANT TO R.S.Mo. 537.095
NOW ON THIS 8th day of June 2022, come the Plaintiffs, in person and by and through
their attorneys of record; Defendant Corizon, LLC; Defendant Karen Williams and Defendant
Alice Bergman by and through their counsel of record; Defendant Michelle Munger by and
through her counsel of record; Defendant Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Defendant
Catherine Van Voorn, Defendant Anne Slagle, and Defendant April Helsel by and through their
counsel of record; Defendants Buchanan County and Dustin Nauman by and through their counsel
of record; Defendant Frederick Covillo, by and through his attorneys of record and no other
appearances are noted. The Court takes up and considers the Plaintiff’s Application for Wrongful
Death Settlement and the Court having reviewed the pleadings, heard the evidence, considered the
statements of counsel with respect to said cause of action, being fully advised in the premises, and
in accordance with Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 537.080, 537.090, does hereby,
ORDER, ADJUDGE AND DECREE:
1.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.095 provides that the trial court must approve any settlement
in a claim for damages under Missouri’s wrongful death statute, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.080.
2.
That the decedent, Justin Stufflebean, died on November 16, 2015, while in the
custody of the Missouri Department of Corrections, all more particularly described in Plaintiffs’
Case 5:17-cv-06058-NKL Document 851 Filed 06/08/22 Page 1 of 5
First Amended Complaint. See Doc. No. 414.
3.
That pursuant to section 537.080, RSMo., Plaintiffs are members of the class of
persons that are entitled to bring this cause of action for the alleged wrongful death of the decedent,
Justin Stufflebean, and they are the only persons entitled to a recovery for damages arising out this
action.
4.
The Plaintiffs have heretofore accepted a settlement offer from Defendants
Frederick Covillo and Alice Bergman and their insurance company in the amounts as set forth in
the confidential settlement agreement and general release provided to the Court in camera and
regarding which the Court previously took evidence on May 25, 2022.
5.
The Plaintiffs have heretofore accepted a settlement offer from Defendant Dustin
Nauman and his insurance company in the amount of $150,000.00 as set forth in the settlement
agreement and limited release provided to the Court and regarding which the Court previously
took evidence on May 25, 2022.
6.
The Plaintiffs have heretofore accepted a settlement offer from Defendant
Buchanan County, Missouri in the amount of $10,000.00 as set forth in the settlement agreement
and release provided to the Court which requires Court approval.
7.
The Plaintiffs have heretofore accepted a settlement offer from Defendants
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Catherine Van Voorn, Anne Slagle and April Helsel in
the amounts set forth in the confidential settlement agreement and general release provided to the
Court in camera which requires Court approval.
8.
The Plaintiffs have heretofore accepted a settlement offer from Defendants
Corizon, LLC, Karen Williams and Michelle Munger in the amounts set forth in the confidential
settlement agreement and general release provided to the Court in camera which requires Court
approval.
2
Case 5:17-cv-06058-NKL Document 851 Filed 06/08/22 Page 2 of 5
9.
The Court finds the foregoing settlements fair and reasonable under all of the
circumstances; approves all of the foregoing settlements and instructs Plaintiffs’ counsel to provide
the executed settlement agreements to counsel for each of the defendants.
10.
Under Mo. Rev. Stat. 537.095.4(2), the Court is required to order Plaintiffs to
deduct and pay the attorney’s fees “as contracted.” The Court does not have judicial discretion to
modify an attorney’s fees agreement, Keene v. Wilson Refuse, Inc., 788 S.W.2d 324, 327 (Mo. Ct.
App. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by Macke v. Patton, 591 S.W.3d 865 (Mo. 2019), and the
Court’s only role is to establish that an attorney’s fee agreement exists and order payment on its
terms. Lewis v. Blue Springs Sch. Dist., No. 4:17-CV-00538-NKL, 2018 WL 1126751, at *2
(W.D. Mo. Mar. 1, 2018) (citing Haynes v. Bohon, 878 S.W.2d 902, 905 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)).
Upon review of the Confidential Affidavit of William W. Bird, and testimony of the parties, the
Court finds that the proposed preliminary attorney’s fees and expenses are consistent with the
Plaintiffs’ contracts with their respective counsel, and the preliminary apportionment amongst
Plaintiffs and their counsel is hereby approved.
11.
That there is a $20,047.63 Missouri Healthnet lien for which Plaintiff Brenda
Davis’ counsel is ordered to set aside funds in his trust account pending resolution.
12.
That upon receipt of the aforesaid settlement funds Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to
execute a receipt for said payments; execute a stipulation to dismiss all claims with prejudice
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and file it with the Court upon clearance of the settlement checks.
Upon receipt thereof, this case will be dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants with each
party to bear their own costs and expenses. Plaintiffs are also ordered to deduct and pay the
expenses and attorney’s fees as contracted; to hold back $20,047.63 in The Bird Law Firm client
trust account pending resolution of the Missouri Healthnet lien and to use those funds for payment
3
Case 5:17-cv-06058-NKL Document 851 Filed 06/08/22 Page 3 of 5
of the same; to distribute the net proceeds to Brenda Davis and Fred Stufflebean as described
below; to distribute any remaining funds after satisfaction of the Missouri Healthnet lien and to
file a final report and account to the Court.
13.
The Court has the discretion to apportion the settlement proceeds and may award
plaintiff unequal portions from the settlement funds. Lewis, 2018 WL 1126751, at *2 (citing
Kavanaugh v. Mid-Century Ins. Co., 937 S.W.2d 243, 246 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)). For the reasons
stated on the record during the apportionment hearing, see Doc. 850, the Court apportions the net
settlement proceeds as follows: Brenda Davis is entitled to 90% of the net settlement proceeds,
and Fred Stufflebean is entitled to 10% of the net settlement proceeds. Any funds that remain after
the satisfaction of the Missouri Healthnet lien shall be apportioned in the same manner. This order
shall survive the dismissal of this action and govern the distribution of settlement funds, consistent
with this and any further order of the Court.
/s/ Nanette K. Laughrey
NANETTE K. LAUGHREY
United States District Court Judge
Dated June 8, 2022
Jefferson City, Missouri
4
Case 5:17-cv-06058-NKL Document 851 Filed 06/08/22 Page 4 of 5
5
Case 5:17-cv-06058-NKL Document 851 Filed 06/08/22 Page 5 of 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?