Fenimore v. Diversified Crop Insurance Services
Filing
18
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed on 12/6/17 by Chief District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
ST. JOSEPH DIVISION
BRAD FENIMORE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CGB DIVERSIFIED SERVICE INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 5:17-CV-006075-DGK
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND DENYING AS MOOT
MOTION TO DISMISS
Now before the Court is CGB Diversified Service, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss
(Doc. 9). After Defendant filed the motion, Brad Fenimore (“Plaintiff”) filed a Second Amended
Petition (Doc. 14) and a Motion to Amend (Doc. 15). After review and consideration, the Court
GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend, and DENIES AS MOOT Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that the Court should freely give
leave to amend when justice so requires. Further, a motion to amend a complaint renders moot a
motion to dismiss that complaint. See Pure Country, Inc. v. Sigma Chi Fraternity, 312 F.3d 952,
956 (8th Cir. 2002). Should it wish to do so, Defendant may file a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s
Second Amended Petition.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Doc. 15) is GRANTED. Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss (Doc. 9) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 6, 2017
/s/ Greg Kays
GREG KAYS, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?