RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. et al v. Hospital Partners, Inc. et al

Filing 883

ORDER fixing amount of sanctions imposed under 28 U.S.C. section 1927. Signed on January 25, 2024, by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law clerk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION RIGHTCHOICE MANAGED CARE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOSPITAL PARTNERS, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 5:18-cv-06037-DGK ORDER REGARDING AMOUNT OF SANCTIONS This lawsuit arose out of a fraudulent pass-through billing scheme for laboratory tests. After an eight-day trial, a jury returned a verdict in Plaintiffs’ favor for $25,653,015. Now pending is the Court’s “Order Imposing Sanctions Under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and Ordering Briefing Concerning the Amount of Sanctions,” ECF No. 869, and the parties’ “Joint Proposal Regarding Reasonable Attorney’s Fees,” ECF No. 880, filed in response. The order held Mr. Minana should be sanctioned under § 1927 for six episodes of conduct during the litigation; it also ordered the parties to brief what the amount of the sanction should be. The parties’ filing asks the Court to “find $293,000 as reasonable attorney’s fees attributable to the conduct for which Mr. Minana was sanctioned.” Joint Proposal at 1. After reviewing the record and the parties’ request, the Court agrees that $293,000 is a reasonable amount attributable to the conduct for which Mr. Minana was sanctioned. Mr. Minana is hereby sanctioned $293,000 under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. The Court ORDERS him to pay this amount to Plaintiffs within thirty days, unless the parties reach a written agreement to pay this amount over some other period of time on terms which are mutually acceptable. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: January 25, 2024 /s/ Greg Kays GREG KAYS, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?