Harris v. Anderson
ORDER adopting 31 Report and Recommendations; petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed without prejudice. (Schroeppel, Kerry)
Harris v. Anderson
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. MARTY C. ANDERSON, Warden, United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Respondent. ) ) ) ) Civil Action ) No. 10-3227-CV-S-RED ) ) ) ) )
ORDER AND JUDGMENT Pursuant to the governing law and in accordance with Local Rule 72.1 of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, the petition herein for a writ of habeas corpus was referred to the United States Magistrate for preliminary review under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The United States Magistrate has completed his preliminary review of the petition herein for a writ of habeas corpus and has submitted to the undersigned a Report and Recommendation that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner has filed exceptions to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate in which he continues to assert the allegations of his original petition. Having fully reviewed the record de novo, the Court agrees with the Magistrate that the petition should be dismissed on the grounds that petitioner has failed to state a constitutional violation and failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Based on the file and records in this case, it is concluded that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and proposed actions of the Magistrate are correct and should be approved. It is therefore
ORDERED that petitioner's exceptions filed herein be, and they are hereby, overruled. It is further ORDERED that petitioner be, and he is hereby, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis. It is further ADJUDGED that the petition herein for a writ of habeas corpus be, and it is hereby, dismissed without prejudice.
/s/ Richard E. Dorr RICHARD E. DORR United States District Judge Date: November 1, 2010
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?