Foy v. Holder et al

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus. Signed on 12/22/10 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Mitchell, Lisa) Copy of Order mailed to Joaquin Irwin Foy, 77218-079,MEDICAL CENTER FOR FEDERAL PRISONERS,P.O. BOX 4000, SPRINGFIELD, MO 65801 on 12/22/2010 (Mitchell, Lisa).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION JOAQUIN IRWIN FOY, Petitioner, v. ERIC HOLDER, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Respondent. ) ) ) ) Civil Action ) No. 10-3324-CV-S-GAF-H ) ) ) ) ORDER AND JUDGMENT Pursuant to the governing law and in accordance with Local Rule 72.1 of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, the petition herein for a writ of habeas corpus was referred to the United States Magistrate for preliminary review under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b). The United States Magistrate has completed his preliminary review of the petition herein for a writ of habeas corpus and has submitted to the undersigned a report and recommendation that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice. Having fully reviewed the record de novo, the Court agrees with the Magistrate that the petition for habeas corpus relief should be dismissed. Based on the file and records in this case, it is concluded that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and proposed actions of the Magistrate are correct and should be approved. It is therefore ORDERED that petitioner be, and he is hereby, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis. It is further ADJUDGED that the petition herein for a writ of habeas corpus be, and it is hereby, dismissed without prejudice. s/ Gary A. Fenner Gary A. Fenner, Judge United States District Court DATED: December 22, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?