Choice Escrow and Land Title, LLC v. BancorpSouth Bank

Filing 36

ORDER that 25 MOTION to strike 23 Second Amended Complaint filed by BancorpSouth Bank is DENIED on its merits. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall file their proposed scheduling order on or before November 28, 2011. Signed on 10/25/11 by Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer. (Alexander, Pam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION Choice Escrow and Land Title, LLC, Plaintiff, V. BancorpSouth Bank, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-3531-CV-W-JTM ) ) ) ) ORDER On October 11, 2011, based upon an inaccurate assessment of the stipulation entered by the parties on October 7, 2011 [Doc. 34], the Court denied as moot BancorpSouth Bank’s MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed August 22, 2011[Doc. 25]. Subsequently, counsel for BancorpSouth Bank telephoned Court staff and advised that the parties’ stipulation was not intended to address BancorpSouth Bank’s motion to strike and that BancorpSouth Bank wished to continue to seek the relief sought in that motion. In its motion, BancorpSouth Bank moves to strike Exhibit 13 and Allegation Nos. 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 64, 65, 92, 93 and 99 of plaintiff’s SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT as either immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f). After due consideration of the issues presented and a review of the challenged material, the Court does not find the exhibit nor the allegations to be so immaterial, impertinent, and/or scandalous as to justify striking them from the SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed August 22, 2011[Doc. 25] is DENIED on its merits. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall file their proposed scheduling order on or before November 28, 2011. /s/ John T. Maughmer JOHN T. MAUGHMER U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?