Pendleton v. Castillo
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus without prejudice. Signed on 2/5/13 by District Judge Richard E. Dorr. (Copy of order mailed to plaintiff.) (Siegert, Karen)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
LINDA SANDERS, Warden, United States
Medical Center for Federal Prisoners,
Case No. 12-3166-CV-S-RED-H
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the governing law and in accordance with Local Rule 72.1 of the United
States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, the petition herein for a writ of habeas
corpus was referred to the United States Magistrate for preliminary review under the provisions
of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
The United States Magistrate has completed his preliminary review of the petition and
has submitted to the undersigned a report and recommendation that the petition be dismissed
without prejudice (Doc. 16).
Petitioner has had a full and fair opportunity to challenge the Magistrate’s recommended
findings of fact, conclusions of law, and proposed action. Petitioner has failed to state or show
any facts or legal principles that would create a genuine issue of material fact or warrant
correction of the legal principles applied by the Magistrate.
therefore be required in this case.
No further proceedings will
Therefore, after a de novo review of the report and recommendation and the files and
records in this case, it is concluded that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and proposed
actions of the Magistrate are correct and should be approved.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner be, and he is hereby, denied leave to
proceed in forma pauperis;
IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED that the petition herein for a writ of habeas corpus be,
and it is hereby, DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: _February 5, 2013_
S/ Richard E. Dorr
RICHARD E. DORR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?