McCollough v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company et al
Filing
42
ORDER ADOPTING IN ITS ENTIRETY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 26 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company in re 36 Findings and Recommendations. MLM's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 10/19/2011. (ACL, )
riLED
BILLINGS DIV.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU~l1
OCT 19 Prl Y 15
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
------DEPUTY CLERK
BY
BILLINGS DIVISION
TIMOTHY MCCOLLOUGH,
)
)
Plaintiff,
CV-09-95-BLG-RFC-CSO
)
)
vs.
)
MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN
DOES I and II,
Defendants.
ORDER
)
)
)
)
---------------------------)
On July 27,20011 United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn Ostby entered
Findings and Recommendation (F&R)(Doc. 36) with respect to Defendant
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company's (MLM) Motion for Judgment
on the Pleadings (Doc. 26). Magistrate Judge Ostby recommends that MLM's
Motion be denied. Judge Ostby concluded that, at this stage in the litigation,
Plaintiff's claims were not barred by the Supremacy Clause of the United States
Constitution. Upon service of a magistrate judge's findings and recommendation,
a party has 14 days to file written objections. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In this
matter, Defendant filed an objection on August 2,2011 (Doc. 39). Plaintiff
1
responded to Defendant's objections on August 12, 2011 (Doc. 40). Defendant's
objections require this Court to make a de novo determination of those portions of
the Findings and Recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. §
636(b )(1).
Defendant objects to the Findings and Recommendation based on the
argument that the Supremacy Clause, specifically an insured's right to defend
itself in federal court, preempts state insurance regulations. In declining to
dismiss all claims with prejudice Judge Ostby points out that the "duty to settle"
issue encompasses only a portion of Plaintiffs Complaint. Judge Ostby states,
"[the insured's] purported refusal to consent to settlement in the underlying case
may be relevant to the defenses raised by MLM, but it does not defeat
McCollough's claims at this stage in the proceedings." Finally, Judge Ostby
makes clear that her recommendation does not preclude a subsequent motion
under Rule 56. After a thorough review, the Court finds Magistrate Judge Ostby's
recommendation well reasoned.
For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
(1) Magistrate Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 36) are
adopted in its entirety.
(2) MLM's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 26) is DENIED.
2
DATED this
4
~
Day of October, 2011 .
.chard Cebull
U.S. District Court Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?