Price v. Mahoney et al

Filing 32

ORDER denying 18 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Carolyn S Ostby on 10/22/2012. (TAG, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION ______________________________ JOHN RONALD PRICE, ) Cause No. CV 10-126-BLG-CSO ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ORDER DENYING STATE’S ) MOTION TO DISMISS LEROY KIRKEGARD; ) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ) THE STATE OF MONTANA, ) ) Respondent. ) ______________________________ This case originally came before the Court on referral pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and D. Mont. L.R. 72.2(a)(1). On April 4, 2012, Respondent (“the State”) moved to dismiss the petition on the grounds that it is time-barred. On September 6, 2012, the Court issued Findings and Recommendation concluding that the motion should be denied and an evidentiary hearing set to determine whether the petition is time-barred. The State filed an objection on September 20, 2012. Thereafter, Petitioner Price was appointed counsel, an evidentiary hearing was ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS / PAGE 1 set, and the parties consented in writing to magistrate judge jurisdiction. See Consents (doc. 30). The State’s objection continues to assert that this Court should determine whether Price’s allegations are sufficient to defeat the time bar. If it were possible to determine the issue on the face of the pleadings, the Court of Appeals would have done so. A hearing is required. Based on the foregoing, the Court enters the following: ORDER The State’s motion to dismiss (doc. 18) is DENIED. DATED this 22nd day of October, 2012. /s/ Carolyn S. Ostby Carolyn S. Ostby United States Magistrate Judge ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS / PAGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?