Scottrade v. Davenport et al

Filing 422

ORDER GRANTING 420 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 2/1/2018. (Copy to Gibbons, Chabot, Davenport) Also notified Finance in Missoula) (AMC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION SCOTTRADE, INC., an Arizona corporation, FILED FEBO 1 l01B Ct;k, U S District Gour· istnct Of Manta ' ""11· na "" 1ngs CV 11-03-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, ORDER vs. KRISTINE DAVENPORT, individually, SHANE M. LEFEBER, individually, CHRISTOPHER GIBBONS, individually, KIMBERLY CHABOT, individually, PATRICIA FALLER, individually, Defendants. PATRICIA FALLER, individually, CHRISTOPHER GIBBONS, individually, KIMBERLY CHABOT, individually, SHAME M. LEFEBER, individually, Cross-Claimants, vs. KRISTINE DAVENPORT, individually, Cross-Defendant. 1 Before the Court is Kristine Davenport's Motion for Distribution of Funds from the Court Registry Investment System. (Doc. 419). On October 3, 2017, the United States Supreme Court denied Davenport's petition for writ of certiorari (Doc. 419) and this case has come to a final resolution. In accordance with this Court's August 1, 2017, Order, Davenport's funds may be distributed. For reasons state above, this Court ORDERS that Davenport's Motion for Distribution of Funds Held in CRIS (Doc. 420) is GRANTED. This Court further ORDERS the Clerk of Court to distribute Davenport's share of the principal, plus her share of the CRIS interest. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Davenport shall deliver all necessary information required by the Finance Department of the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana to the Clerk, on or before March 1, 2018, in order to issue the check as set forth above. DATED this _L:{i'ay of February 20 United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?