Horob v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

Filing 6

ORDER TO CLOSE FILE. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 5/9/2012. Mailed to Horob. (TAG, )

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION TODD KENNETH HOROB, Cause No. CV 12-00041-BLG-RFC-CSO Plaintiff, vs. ORDER TO CLOSE FILE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and EMPLOYEES OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendants. Plaintiff Todd Kenneth Horob, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted what was liberally construed as a civil complaint. The word "Complaint" appeared at the top of the document, Mr. Horob was listed as the plaintiff and the named defendants were listed as the "Federal Bureau of Prisons and Employ's The United States Department of Justice." (Doc. 1). Horob did not submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and did not pay the filing fee. On April 5, 2012, Judge Ostby issued an order requiring Horob to either pay the $350.00 filing fee as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 3). On April 13, 2012, Horob filed a document entitled "Heads up to Judge Ostby" wherein Horob states he did not file a Complaint alleging various claims with the District of Montana and he is not responsible to pay the filing fee or to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 4). Horob also filed a Motion for the Federal Bureau of Prison to release him from false incarceration. (Doc. 5). Whether or not Horob intended to file a complaint or not, no filing fee has been paid and no motion to proceed in forma pauperis has been filed, therefore no case has been initiated. Horob's Complaint has not been filed, it was simply lodged with the Court. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this file. SO ORDERED..R:t\ DATED this ­ ~ day of May, 2012. -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?