Switzer v. BIA Crow Tribal Police

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 in full. 2 Complaint isDISMISSED. Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 3/19/2013. Mailed to Switzer. (TAG, )

Download PDF
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAR 19 2013 FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA Cl~~ U SOf"-- vvurt District "-ยท _ .,..llict . "KJfltana B'.111ngs BILLINGS DIVISION WILLIAM ZARNEL SWITZER, CV-12-115-BLG-RFC-CSO Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE BIA CROW TRIBAL POLICE, Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn Ostby recommends this matter be dismissed because prose Plaintiff William Switzer failed to comply with a prior Order directing him to file an amended complaint demonstrating subject matter jurisdiction. Docs. 11 & 12. Switzer has yet to respond to Judge Ostby's prior Orders or recommendation (doc. 12) that this case be dismissed. Moreover, the copy of the Findings and Recommendations mailed to Switzer was returned "undeliverable." Doc. 13. Accordingly, Switzer having failed to demonstrate a basis for jurisdiction or to follow Orders of this Court, IT IS ORDERED that his Complaint is DISMISSED. I IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the docket reflect that this Court certifies pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3)(A) that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk of Court shall close this matter and enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Ru~Civil Procedure. DATED the j{j'_ day of March, 2013. CHARD F. CEBULL UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?