Switzer v. BIA Crow Tribal Police
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 in full. 2 Complaint isDISMISSED. Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 3/19/2013. Mailed to Switzer. (TAG, )
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MAR 19 2013
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
Cl~~ U SOf"-- vvurt
District "-ยท _
.,..llict
. "KJfltana
B'.111ngs
BILLINGS DIVISION
WILLIAM ZARNEL SWITZER,
CV-12-115-BLG-RFC-CSO
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
BIA CROW TRIBAL POLICE,
Defendants.
United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn Ostby recommends this matter be
dismissed because prose Plaintiff William Switzer failed to comply with a prior
Order directing him to file an amended complaint demonstrating subject matter
jurisdiction. Docs. 11 & 12. Switzer has yet to respond to Judge Ostby's prior
Orders or recommendation (doc. 12) that this case be dismissed. Moreover, the
copy of the Findings and Recommendations mailed to Switzer was returned
"undeliverable." Doc. 13.
Accordingly, Switzer having failed to demonstrate a basis for jurisdiction or
to follow Orders of this Court, IT IS ORDERED that his Complaint is
DISMISSED.
I
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the docket reflect that this Court
certifies pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3)(A) that any appeal of this decision
would not be taken in good faith.
The Clerk of Court shall close this matter and enter judgment pursuant to
Rule 58 of the Federal Ru~Civil Procedure.
DATED the
j{j'_ day of March, 2013.
CHARD F. CEBULL
UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?