In Re Kane
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 . Kane's Petition 1 is DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 12/11/2012. Mailed to Kane. (TAG, )
-
-------------------~
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURTFILED
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
DEC II 2012
BILLINGS DIVISION
Cleric. us n;.,..,_ "-··Dililrlci or~·"" """''
Billi,:mana
IN Re: NORA KANE,
Case No. CV-12-125-BLG-RFC-CSO
Petitioner,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Petitioner Nora Kane has filed documents which United States Magistrate
Judge Carolyn S. Ostby has construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Doc. 1. Because Kane's claims were not clearly
pleaded, Judge Ostby issued an order permitting her to file an amended petition by
October 24, 2012, supplying a form for her use, and explaining that failure to
comply with the Order could result in the dismissal of the action. Doc. 3. When
almost two months passed without a response from Kane, Judge Ostby issued
Findings and Recommendations recommending the Petition be dismissed without
prejudice because she was challenging ongoing state court proceedings. Doc. 4.
Kane has also failed to comply with Judge's Ostby's Order that she keep the Court
I
apprised of her current address because the Findings and Recommendations were
returned to the Court as undeliverable, indicating that she was no longer living at
the address on file with the Court. Doc. 5.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Kane's Petition (doc. 1) is
DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
The Clerk of Court should be directed to enter by separate document a
judgment of dismissal.
DATED the
Jt;;-
_J./:_ day of December, 20
RICHARD F. CEBULL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?