McAdam v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 3 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Complaint is Dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 10/23/2013. Hard copy to Plaintiff Toby McAdam (CLR) Modified on 10/23/2013 to correct text(CLR).
FILED
OCT 2 3 2013
Clerk, U S District Court
District Of Mont•na
Billings
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BILLINGS DIVISION
TOBY C. McADAM,
Plaintiff,
No. CV-12-137-BLG-SEH
vs.
ORDER
UNITED STATES FOOD AND
DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
MARGARET A. HAMBURG,
COMMISSIONER OF FDA,
Defendants.
United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn S. Ostby entered Findings and
Recommendations in this matter on September 30, 2013. 1 Plaintiff filed
objections on October 18, 2013. 2 The Court reviews de nova findings and
recommendations to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l).
Upon de nova review of the record, I find no error in Judge Ostby' s
Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. The claims asserted by
1
Doc. 21
2
Doc. 22
Plaintiff may be dismissed because: 1) they constitute an impermissible collateral
attack on the Consent Decree entered in Cause CV-10-128-BLG-RFC on
November 4, 2010, 2) they are barred by the doctrine of res judicata, and 3) the
United States is immune from liability for constitutional torts.
ORDERED:
1.
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 3 is GRANTED.
2.
Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.
3.
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
DATEDthis ~
/J!l.
dayofOctober,2013.
/SAME. HADDON
United States District Judge
3
Doc. 3
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?