McAdam v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 3 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Complaint is Dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 10/23/2013. Hard copy to Plaintiff Toby McAdam (CLR) Modified on 10/23/2013 to correct text(CLR).

Download PDF
FILED OCT 2 3 2013 Clerk, U S District Court District Of Mont•na Billings IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION TOBY C. McADAM, Plaintiff, No. CV-12-137-BLG-SEH vs. ORDER UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MARGARET A. HAMBURG, COMMISSIONER OF FDA, Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn S. Ostby entered Findings and Recommendations in this matter on September 30, 2013. 1 Plaintiff filed objections on October 18, 2013. 2 The Court reviews de nova findings and recommendations to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Upon de nova review of the record, I find no error in Judge Ostby' s Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full. The claims asserted by 1 Doc. 21 2 Doc. 22 Plaintiff may be dismissed because: 1) they constitute an impermissible collateral attack on the Consent Decree entered in Cause CV-10-128-BLG-RFC on November 4, 2010, 2) they are barred by the doctrine of res judicata, and 3) the United States is immune from liability for constitutional torts. ORDERED: 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 3 is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. DATEDthis ~ /J!l. dayofOctober,2013. /SAME. HADDON United States District Judge 3 Doc. 3 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?