Heart K. Land & Cattle Co. v. Sakal et al
Filing
121
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 84 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Findings and Recommendations re 111 Findings and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 1/29/2014. (dle)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BILLINGS DIVISION
HEART K LAND & CATTLE CO., INC.,
CV 12–162–BLG–DWM–JCL
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
MICHAEL A. LONG, FRANCES A.
SAKAL, LAUREN C. LONG, UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, MONTANA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al.,
Defendants.
FRANCES A. SAKAL,
Counterclaimant,
vs.
HEART K LAND & CATTLE CO., INC.,
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE, et al.,
Counter-Defendants.
-1-
LAUREN C. LONG,
Counterclaimant,
vs.
HEART K LAND & CATTLE CO., INC.,
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE, et al.,
Counter-Defendants.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Counterclaimant,
vs.
HEART K LAND & CATTLE CO., INC.,
FRANCES A. SAKAL, LAUREN C.
LONG, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE, and MICHAEL A. LONG,
Counter-Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court on Findings and Recommendations
entered by United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch, (Doc. 111),
regarding a Motion for Summary Judgment brought by the United States, as
Defendant and Counterclaimant, (Doc. 84). Judge Lynch recommends the United
-2-
States’ Motion be granted as to Michael Long’s 2010 federal tax liability and
denied in all other respects. (Doc. 111 at 27.) Objections to Judge Lynch’s
Findings and Recommendations were due January 27, 2014. (Doc. 112.) No
timely objection was filed.
Where no party objects, the Court reviews the findings and
recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge for clear error. McDonnell
Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.
1981). Clear error is present only if the Court is left with a “definite and firm
conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d
422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000).
Judge Lynch’s Findings and Recommendations are without clear error. The
United States seeks summary judgment as to all claims advanced in its four-count
counterclaim in this case. These claims seek to reduce to judgment the joint
federal income tax liabilities of Michael Long and Lauren Long for the 2009 tax
year, to reduce to judgment the individual federal income tax liability of Michael
Long for the 2010 tax year, to negate the purported transfer of the Suce Creek
Property from Michael Long to Francis Sakal as a fraudulent conveyance, and to
foreclose on its federal tax liens on the Suce Creek Property. The United States’
Motion is well-taken as to Michael Long’s 2010 federal tax liability, as there is no
-3-
genuine issue of material fact and the United States is entitled to judgment as a
matter of law on this point. The existence of a genuine issue of material fact as to
Michael and Lauren Long’s 2009 federal tax liability precludes the entry of
summary judgment as to that portion of the United States’ Motion. Similarly,
genuine issues of material fact preclude the entry of summary judgment as to the
United States’ fraudulent transfer claim. The United States has not established as
a matter of law that it is entitled to foreclose on its lien interests attached to the
Suce Creek Property and therefore summary judgment is denied as to that claim.
IT IS ORDERED that Judge Lynch’s Findings and Recommendations as to
the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 111), are ADOPTED IN
FULL.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States’ Motion for Summary
Judgment, (Doc. 84), is GRANTED as to Count II of the Counterclaim, which
seeks to reduce to judgment the individual federal income tax liability of Michael
Long for the 2010 tax year. The United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment is
DENIED as to Counts I, III, and IV of the Counterclaim.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in
favor of the United States and against Michael Long in the amount of
$142,994.68, less any credits according to proof, plus interest and other statutory
-4-
additions, as provided by law, that have accrued since December 31, 2013.
DATED this 29th day of January, 2014.
-5-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?