Knudsen v. Kirkegard et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10 in full. The Petition 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. A certificated of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 10/20/2014. Mailed to Knudsen. (TAG, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION FILED DCT 2 O2014 Clerk, U S District Court District Of Montana Billings JOHNNY LEE KNUDSEN, CV 14-36-BLG-SPW Petitioner, ORDER VS. LEROY KIRKEGARD; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Respondents. Petitioner Johnny Lee Knudsen brings this action seeking to vacate his state sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn Ostby entered Findings and Recommendations on September 29, 2014, in which she recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), written objections to Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendations were due 14 days after their filing. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court must still review Judge Ostby's conclusions for clear error. Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir.2000). After reviewing the Findings and 1 Recommendations, this Court does not find that Judge Ostby committed clear error. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 10) are ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. The Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of exhaustion. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter by separate document a judgment of dismissal. 4. A certificated of appealability is DENIED. ~ DATED this do day of October 2014~. /? wczd-~ ,c=.~-=-~~~~~~~~~~~ SUSANP. WATTERS United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?