Dye v. BNSF Railway Company

Filing 50

ORDER granting 37 Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Smelko. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn S Ostby on 1/14/2016. (JDR, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION S. Dye, CV-14-150-BLG-CSO Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING BNSF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. SMELKO vs. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. Defendant BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”) filed a motion to exclude the testimony of Plaintiff S. Dye’s (“Dye”) rebuttal expert witness, Dr. Bowman Smelko, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c). BNSF’s Mtn. to Exclude (ECF No. 37). In her response, Dye does not substantively object to the motion and affirmatively “withdraws Dr. Smelko as her rebuttal expert witness.” Dye’s Resp. Br. (ECF No. 44 at 2). Although counsel for the parties disagree about the content and scope of their communications, such disagreements are not directly pertinent to the disposition of this pending motion. Dye has not explained her apparent failure to make required expert disclosures and has withdrawn Dr. Smelko as a witness. -1- Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that BNSF’s motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Smelko (ECF No. 37) is GRANTED. The Court will address other pending motions in subsequent orders. DATED this 14th day of January, 2016. /s/ Carolyn S. Ostby United States Magistrate Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?