Elliot v. Elliot
Filing
114
ORDER DENYING 105 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion to Expedite the Trial; GRANTING 110 Motion to Substitute Party; Vacating Scheduling Order; Stay Further Proceedings. Joseph V. Womack added as a Plaintiff in place of the Estate of Ada Elliot. Womack shall file a status report with the Court on or before August 15, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 6/21/2019. (AMC)
FILED
JUN 2 1 2019
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BILLINGS DIVISION
IAN ELLIOT and JOSEPH V,
WOMACK, Special Administrator of the
Estate of Ada E. Elliot,
Clerk, U.S District Court
District Of Montana
GrMtFalls
CV 15-107-BLG-JTJ
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
vs,
CINDY M. ELLIOT and ELLIOT AND
ASSOCIATES,
Defendants,
The Court conducted a hearing on all of the pending motions on
June 20, 2019, For the reasons discussed in open court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff Ian Elliot's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 105- I)
is DENIED.
2,
Plaintiff Ian Elliot's Motion to Expedite the Trial (Doc. 105-2) is
DENIED.
3.
Joseph V. Womack's Motion for Substitution of Party (Doc, 110-1) is
GRANTED, The caption in this case shall be modified as set forth above to
substitute Joseph V. Womack as a Plaintiff in place of the Estate of Ada Elliot.
4.
Joseph V. Womack's Motion Vacate Scheduling Order (Doc. 110-2)
is GRANTED. All deadlines in the Court's Scheduling Order of January 9, 2019,
are VACATED, including the trial set for November 12, 2019.
5.
Joseph V. Womack's Motion to Stay Further Proceedings
(Doc. 110-3) is GRANTED. All proceedings in this case shall be STAYED
pending further order of the Court. Womack shall file a status report with the
Court on or before August 15, 2019.
DATED this 21st day of June, 2019.
_,
'-~._
.•/
/~~-,,__--~---- ---
;.>"
l-,.
---- -:=--~
" - ""--John1ohnston
United States Magistrate Judge
2
,_
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?