SleekEZ, LLC v. Horton et al
Filing
77
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL. DENYING 59 Motion in Limine AND DENYING 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 2/28/2018. (AMC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BILLINGS DIVISION
SLEEKEZ, LLC,
CV 16-09-BLG-SPW
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING
FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
vs.
HAL HORTON, doing business as
Groom Ninja,
Defendant.
Before the Court are United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan's
Findings and Recommendations filed on January 8, 2018. (Doc. 76). Judge Cavan
recommends that this Court deny Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude
Testimony of James Winchell. Judge Cavan also recommends this Court deny
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(l), the parties were required to file written
objections within 14 days of the filing of Judge Cavan's Findings and
Recommendations. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this
Court reviews Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations for clear error.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313
(9th Cir. 1981 ). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm
1
conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d
422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendations, this
Court does not find that Judge Cavan committed clear error.
IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered
by United States Magistrate Judge Cavan (Doc. 76) are ADOPTED IN FULL.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude
Testimony of James Winchell is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary
Judgment is DENIED.
'-P-DATED thisQ{L day of February, 2018.
~~J~
SUSANP. WATTERS
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?