In Re Herrod
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 in full. Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 1/27/2017. Mailed to Herrod. (TAG)
FILED
JAN 2 7 2017
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BILLINGS DIVISION
Clerk, U.S. District Court
Disllict Of Montana
Billings
NATHAN HERROD,
CV 16-125-BLG-SPW
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
POPULASE COMMADERY OF
INTENT REPRODUCTION AND
COPY OF DOCUMENTS
IDENTIFICATION OF RECEIVED
PAPER WORK AND NOTES,
Defendants.
Before the Court are United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan's
Findings and Recommendations, filed on January 4, 2017. (Doc. 6). In his
Findings and Recommendations, Judge Cavan recommends that this Court dismiss
Herrod's case without prejudice.
Pursuant to 28 U. S.C. ยง 63 6(b )( 1), the parties were required to file written
objections within 14 days of the filing of Judge Cavan's Findings and
Recommendations. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this
Court reviews Judge Cavan's conclusions for clear error. Clear error exists if the
Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been
committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). After
1
reviewing the Findings and Recommendations, this Court does not find that Judge
Cavan committed clear error.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 6) are ADOPTED
IN FULL.
2.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter and enter judgment
pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to have the docket reflect that the Court
certifies pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith.
DATED
thi,o?l~f J~uary 2017. ;\
#;L2-a>==r[(~~
SUSAN P. WA TIERS
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?