Buckhorn Energy Oaks Disposal Services, LLC et al v. Clean Energy Holding Company, LLC et al

Filing 57

ORDER denying without prejudice as moot 48 Motion to Compel. Joint status report and proposed schedule due by 12/20/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 11/26/2018. (JDR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION BUCKHORN ENERGY OAKS DISPOSAL SERVICES, LLC and OAKS DISPOSAL SERVICES, LLC, CV 16-141-BLG-TJC ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. CLEAN ENERGY HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, BRUCE BENTZ, T.J. HERRMANN, JOHN WALSH, SHELDON SMITH, JOHN DOES 150, and JOHN DOE ENTITIES 1-5, Defendants. A status conference was held in this case on November 20, 2018. After discussion and upon the agreement of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant has provided the Plaintiffs with responses to outstanding discovery requests. Therefore, pursuant to the agreement of the parties, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel (Doc. 48) is DENIED without prejudice as MOOT. If necessary, Plaintiffs may refile the motion after they have an opportunity to complete their review of the Defendants’ responses; 2. On or before December 20, 2018, the parties shall file a joint status report setting forth: (1) what effect the stay in In re: Clean Energy Fluids Systems, LLC, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of North Dakota Bky. No. 16-30497 has on this 1 case, and (2) to what extent the resolution of the issues in that case will be dispositive of the issues in this case. If the parties are unable to agree upon a joint status report addressing these issues, they may file separate reports outlining their respective positions. 3. On or before December 20, 2018, the parties shall file a proposed schedule for the completion of discovery and filing pretrial motions. IT IS ORDERED. DATED this 26th day of November, 2018 _______________________________ TIMOTHY J. CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?