LaForge v. Gets Down et al

Filing 22

ORDER granting 19 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - Kenneth J. Pfaehler. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 8/8/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 7/24/2017. (JDR) Modified on 7/24/2017: hard copy mailed to pro se plaintiff (JDR).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION MICHAEL F. LAFORGE, CV 17-48-BLG-BMM-TJC Plaintiff, ORDER vs. JANICE GETS DOWN, NATASHA J. MORTON, LEROY NOT AFRAID, SHEILA WILKINSON NOT AFRAID, Defendants. Defendants Leroy Not Afraid and Sheila Wilkinson Not Afraid, move for the admission of Kenneth J. Pfaehler to practice before this Court in this case with Samuel E. Kohn to act as local counsel. Mr. Pfaehler’s application appears to be in order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to admit Kenneth J. Pfaehler pro hac vice is GRANTED on the condition that Mr. Pfaehler shall do his own work. This means that Mr. Pfaehler must do his own writing, sign his own pleadings, motions, and briefs, and appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court’s electronic filing system (“CMECF”). Further information is available on the Court’s website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk’s Office. Mr. Pfaehler may move for the admission pro hac vice of one (1) associate of his firm. Such associate, if duly admitted, shall be authorized to participate in this case on the same terms and conditions as Mr. Pfaehler. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Mr. Pfaehler, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a pleading acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above. IT IS ORDERED. DATED this 24th day of July, 2017. _______________________________ TIMOTHY J. CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?