Nicholls et al v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 20

ORDER. Mountain Wests Motion to Dismiss Count II of Complaint: Tortious Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P. (Doc. 7) is hereby DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 8/8/2017. (JDR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION CHAVIS NICHOLLS and FALON NICHOLLS, Plaintiffs, CV 17-63-BLG-TJC ORDER vs. MOUNTAIN WEST FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Before the Court is defendant Mountain West Farm Bureau Insurance Company’s (“Mountain West”) Motion to Dismiss Count II of Complaint: Tortious Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P. (Doc. 7; the “Motion.”) As the Motion’s title indicates, Mountain West seeks the dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of Count II of plaintiffs Chavis Nicholls’ and Falon Nicholls’ (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) original Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. (Doc. 3; “Original Complaint.”) Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) in response to the Motion, withdrawing Count II of the Original Complaint. Plaintiffs argue that the Motion is now moot because the claim Mountain West seeks to dismiss is no longer at issue. (Doc. 12.) Counsel for Mountain West indicated at the Preliminary Pretrial Conference, held August 8, 2017, that he agrees the Amended Complaint mooted the Motion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Mountain West’s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Complaint: Tortious Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P. (Doc. 7) is hereby DENIED as moot. DATED this 8th day of August, 2017. _______________________________ TIMOTHY J. CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?