Porch et al v. Ochoa's Construction, Inc. et al

Filing 82

CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendation for disposition of this matter entered by United States Magistrate Judge Cavan (Doc. 80) are ADOPTED IN FULL.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order Granting Filing of S econd Amended Complaint (Doc. 27) is VACATED; and Plaintiffs' claims against PCIC and Golden state are DISMISSED without prejudice, to be raised again in the context of a separate action, subject to whatever defenses any defendant may have to those claims. (AMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION KELLY D. PORCH and MICHELLE R. PORCH, Case No. CV-17-93 -BLG-SPW JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Plaintiffs, vs. OCHOA'S CONSTRUCTION, INC.; PREFERRED CONTRACTORS INSURANCE COMPANY RISK RETENTION GROUP; GOLDEN STATE CLAIMS ADJUSTERS; and JOHN DOES I-V, Defendants. Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. X Decision by Court. This action came before the Court for bench trial, hearing, or determination on the record. A decision has been rendered. ORDERED that the Order Granting Filing of Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 27) is VACATED; and Plaintiffs' claims against PCIC and Golden state are DISMISSED without prejudice, to be raised again in the context of a separate action, subject to whatever defenses any defendant may have to those claims. Dated this 3rd day of July, 2018. TYLER P. GILMAN, CLERK By: /s/ A. Carrillo A. Carrillo, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?