United States of America v. $10,704.00 in U. S. Currency

Filing 14

ORDER granting 13 Motion for Judgment of Forfeiture. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: The United States is granted a default judgment against the defendant currency in the amount of $10,704.00 and against any person as serting a claim to, or interest in, the defendant currency. The defendant currency consisting of $10,704.00 is hereby forfeited to the United States and shall be disposed of in accordance with the law. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 11/22/2017. (EMH)

Download PDF
LE D IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION NOV 2 2 2017 Clerk, U S District Court District Of Montana - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ng s Bi lli CV 17-98-BLG-SPW-TJC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND ORDER OF FORFEITURE $10,704.00 in U.S. Currency, Defendant. This matter is brought before this Court by Plaintiff, United States, by and through its attorney, Victoria L. Francis, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Montana. The United States has filed a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment and Order of Forfeiture pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) (Doc. 13). Upon considering the pleadings filed herein, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On August 3, 2017, the United States instituted a judicial forfeiture action by filing in this cause a Verified Complaint in Rem against the defendant funds in the amount of $10,704.00, to forfeit property under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 881(a)(6) asserting the defendant currency was furnished or intended to be furnished in 1 exchange for a controlled substance, and/or was used or intended to be used to facilitate one or more violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841, et seq. (Doc. 2) 2. On August 21, 201 7, the United States Marshal Service executed the Warrant of Arrest in Rem that was issued by this Court on August 8, 201 7, and arrested the defendant currency. (Doc. 6). 3. On August 3, 2017, the United States provided "actual notice" of this civil asset forfeiture action on August 3, by mailing the Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture and Verified Complaint In Rem (Doc. 2) to Raymond Tetzlaff, via first class U.S. mail and Certified mail to the address provided in his administrative claim. On August 29, 2017, a copy of the Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem to Counsel (Doc. 5) was mailed via first class U.S. mail and Certified mail to the address of claimant's defense counsel, Kelly J. Varnes. 4. On August 3, 2017, the United States provided "actual notice" of this civil asset forfeiture action on August 3, by mailing the Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture and Verified Complaint In Rem (Doc. 2) to Crystal Busby-Tetzlaff, via first class U.S. mail and Certified mail to the address provided in her administrative claim. On August 29, 2017, a copy of the Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem to Counsel (Doc. 5) was mailed via first class U.S . mail and Certified mail to the address of claimant's defense counsel, Matthew Wald. 2 5. Notice of this forfeiture action was also provided to known and unknown potential claimants by publishing on the government's asset forfeiture website the Notice of Forfeiture Action for 30 consecutive days, beginning on July 25, 2017, and ending on August 23, 2017. The "Notice of Forfeiture Action" provides in pertinent part as follows: Any person claiming a legal interest in the Defendant Property must file a verified Claim with the court within 60 days from the first day of publication (July 25, 2017) of this Notice on this official government internet web site and an Answer to the complaint or motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within 21 days thereafter .... (Dec. of Publication, Doc. 7, Att. 1). 6. Upon considering the United States' Unopposed Motion for Entry of Default of Known and Unknown Potential Claimants (Doc. 10), the Clerk of District Court entered the default of Raymond Tetzlaff, Crystal Busby-Tetzlaff, and any unknown potential claimants, on November 16, 2017, for failure to timely file a verified claim and/or to answer or otherwise defend as required by the Supplemental Rules. 7. (Doc. 12). The factual allegations set forth in paragraphs 5 through 30, Doc. 1 are verified by Michael T. Zidack, Special Agent for the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. (Doc. 1, pp. 2-14) Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Court makes the following 3 conclusions of law. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 8. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 1355. The United States has filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem to forfeit the defendant property under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 881(a)(6), as funds constituting monies or other things of value furnished or intended to be furnished in exchange for a controlled substance, and/or were used or intended to be used to facilitate one or more violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841, et seq. 9. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1355(b)(l)(A) and 1395(b) or (c), venue is proper in this district because this is a civil proceeding to forfeit United States Currency found in this district, and the acts or omissions complained of occurred in this district. 10. Civil forfeitures are governed by the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. United States v. 2659 Roundhill Drive, 283 F.3d 1146, 1149 n.2 (9th Cir. 2002). 11. The Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem sets forth detailed facts to support a reasonable belief that the United States will be able to meet its burden of proof at trial as required by Supplemental Rule G(2)(f), to support probable 4 cause, and to provide proof by a preponderance of the evidence to seize and arrest the defendant currency described in the verified complaint. The facts contained in the verified complaint support the institution of these forfeiture proceedings for a knowing and willful violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, and subject to forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). 12. The totality of circumstances as set forth in the Verified Complaint in Rem, demonstrates that there is a substantial connection that the defendant currency was furnished or intended to be furnished in exchange for a controlled substance, and/or was used or intended to be used to facilitate one or more violations of21 U.S.C. § 841, et seq. 13. Notice of this action was properly provided to known potential claimant, Raymond Tetzlaff, by providing "actual notice" to him, and his counsel, by mailing the Verified Complaint In Rem, , in accordance with Supplemental Rule G( 4)(b )(v). 14. Notice of this action was properly provided to known potential claimant, Crystal Busby-Tetzlaff, by providing "actual notice" to her, and her counsel, by mailing the Verified Complaint In Rem, , in accordance with Supplemental Rule G(4)(b)(v). 15. Notice by publication was also provided to known and unknown 5 potential claimants in accordance with Supplemental Rule (G)( 4)(a)(iv)(C). 16. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) and Supplemental Rules A(2) and G(S), the Clerk of District Court properly entered the default of Raymond Tetzlaff, Crystal Busby-Tetzlaff, and any unknown claimants. 17. (Doc. 12). Pursuant to Fed. R .. Civ. P. 55(b)(2), the United States is entitled to a judgment of default against the defendant currency in the amount of$10,704.00, and any claims to the defendant currency. 18. The United States is further entitled to an order of forfeiture of the defendant currency in the amount of$10,704.00. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 1. The United States is granted a default judgment against the defendant currency in the amount of $10,704.00 and against any person asserting a claim to, or interest in, the defendant currency. 2. The defendant currency consisting of $10,704.00 is hereby forfeited to the United States and shall be disposed of in accordance with the law. DATED this p(dnfay of November, 2017. ~ l'-0 ~ SSANP.WATfERS United States District Judge 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?