Ellison v. Yellowstone County et al
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 in full. Claims arising from his arrest and criminal prosecution are DISMISSED. Defendants Yellowstone County, the City of Billings, Scott Twito, Julie Mees, Brett Linneweber, Sheriff Mike Linder, Detective Frank Fritz, Officer B. Richardson, Michael Kakuk, Danny Tenenbaum, Chad Wright, Captain Bofto, and Lt. Metzer are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 12/13/2018. Mailed to Ellison. (TAG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BILLINGS DIVISION
LIONEL SCOTT ELLISON,
Plaintiff,
CV 18-56-BLG-BMM-JTJ
vs.
YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, et al.,
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
Plaintiff Lionel Ellison, a prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed a
Complaint and an Amended Complaint alleging violations of his constitutional
rights during the course of his 2015 criminal trial. (Docs. 2, 15.) Ellison’s
allegations arise from his arrest and criminal prosecution. Ellison alleges violations
of the following constitutional rights: (1) his Fourth Amendment right to only be
arrested based upon probable cause; (2) his Fifth Amendment right to due process
and right against double jeopardy; (3) his Sixth Amendment right to competent
assistance of counsel; (4) his Eight Amendment right to adequate food and
1
protection from other inmates; and (5) his Fourteenth Amendment rights to due
process and equal protection were violated when the prosecution withheld
exculpatory and impeaching evidence, the trial judge was biased, Yellowstone
County detectives committed violent crimes against him and he was wrongfully
convicted, and appellate counsel refused to adequately represent him in a timely
and correct manner.
Ellison is a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis. Judge Johnston reviewed
his Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Section 1915(e)(2)(B) allows for the
dismissal of a pro se prisoner complaint before it is served upon the defendants if it
is frivolous, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks
monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. A complaint is
frivolous if it “lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. Williams,
490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). A complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted if a plaintiff fails to allege the “grounds” of his “entitlement to relief.”
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007).
Further, Rule 8(a)(2) requires a complaint to “contain sufficient factual
matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009). Judge Johnston screened Ellison’s
Complaint and determined that that Ellison’s claims were frivolous and lacked
2
arguable substance in law or fact. (Doc. 14 at 12.) Judge Johnston issued Findings
and Recommendations in this matter on November 8, 2018. (Doc. 17.)
Judge Johnston ordered that Defendants Washington, Groslock, Johnson,
and Peters are required to respond to Ellison’s conditions of confinement claims
and retaliation claims. Id. at 12. Judge Johnston determined that Defendants
Yellowstone County, the City of Billings, Scott Twito, Julie Mees, Brett
Linneweber, Sheriff Mike Linder, Detective Frank Fritz, Officer B. Richardson,
Michael Kakuk, Danny Tenenbaum, Chad Wright, Captain Bufto, and Lt. Metzer
should be dismissed. Id. at 17.
Ellison timely filed an objection on November 26, 2018. (Doc. 18.) Ellison’s
objections entitle him to de novo review of those findings and recommendations to
which he specifically has objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court reviews
for clear error the portions of the Findings and Recommendations to which Ellison
did not specifically objected. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus.
Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Where a party’s objections
constitute perfunctory responses argued in an attempt to engage the district court in
a reargument of the same arguments set forth in the original response, however, the
Court will review the applicable portions of the findings and recommendations for
3
clear error. Rosling v. Kirkegard, 2014 WL 693315 *3 (D. Mont. Feb. 21, 2014)
(internal citations omitted).
Ellison’s objection fails to present legal argument and supporting authority.
Ellison failed to object properly to any of Judge Johnston’s Findings and
Recommendations. This Court reviews therefore the record for clear error. L.R.
72.3(a); see also McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656
F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston’s
Findings and Recommendations.
1.
IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston’s Findings and
Recommendations (Doc. 17), are ADOPTED IN FULL.
2.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Washington,
Groslock, Johnson, and Paters will be required to respond to Ellison’s conditions
of confinement claims and retaliation claims.
3.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ellison’s claims arising from his
arrest and criminal prosecution are DISMISSED.
4.
Defendants Yellowstone County, the City of Billings, Scott Twito,
Julie Mees, Brett Linneweber, Sheriff Mike Linder, Detective Frank Fritz, Officer
4
B. Richardson, Michael Kakuk, Danny Tenenbaum, Chad Wright, Captain Bofto,
and Lt. Metzer are DISMISSED.
DATED this 13th day of December, 2018.
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?