Anderson v. Mountain View Pizza Co. et al

Filing 38

ORDER STRIKING FILING. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures filed as Doc. 37 shall be STRICKEN from the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 6/29/2018. (JDR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BILLINGS DIVISION
MIKE ANDERSON, individually and
on behalf of similarly situated persons,
Plaintiff,

CV 18-58-BLG-SPW-TJC

ORDER STRIKING FILING

vs.
MOUNTAIN VIEW PIZZA CO.,
BLACK HILLS PIZZA, INC., and
CHOOSE THE RIGHT PIZZA, LLC,
Defendants.
Plaintiffs have filed a document styled as a Motion for Disclosure of
Plaintiffs’ Initial Disclosures. (Doc. 37.) Upon review of the filing, however, it
appears that Plaintiffs have filed their Rule 26 Initial Disclosures, and are not in
fact, seeking any relief from the Court. Local Rule 26.1(c) states that “Initial
disclosures may not be filed.” L.R. 26.1(c). Further Local Rule 26.2 provides that
initial disclosures and other discovery, are not to be routinely filed, unless a motion
is filed relating to discovery, and the documents are relevant to the motion. L.R.
26.2 (a)-(b). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Initial
Disclosures filed as Doc. 37 shall be STRICKEN from the record.
DATED this 29th day of June, 2018.
_______________________________
TIMOTHY J. CAVAN
United States Magistrate Judge