Eaton v. Montana Silversmiths
Filing
58
ORDER denying 56 Motion to Compel. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 56) is DENIED with leave to renew. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 1/29/2020. (JDR) Modified on 1/29/2020: hard copy mailed to pro se plaintiff (JDR).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BILLINGS DIVISION
ROBERT A. EATON,
CV 18-65-BLG-SPW-TJC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
MONTANA SILVERSMITHS,
Defendant.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s First Request for
Production. (Doc. 56). The Court notes that Plaintiff failed to adhere to Local
Rules 7.1(c), which states:
(1) The text of the motion must state that the other parties have been
contacted and state whether any party objects to the motion. . . .
(2) When a motion is unopposed, the word “unopposed” must appear in the
title of the motion.
Adherence to this local rule allows the Court, and often the parties, to handle
matters more expeditiously. Compliance with the local rule is required. Local
Rules, Federal Rules, and Statutes can be found at:
https://www.mtd.uscourts.gov/court-info/local-rules-and-orders
//
//
//
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 56) is DENIED with leave
to renew.
DATED this 29th day of January, 2019.
_______________________________
TIMOTHY J. CAVAN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?