WBI Energy Transmissions, Inc. v. Subsurface Easements for the Storage of Natural Gas in the Judith River Subterranean Geological Formation et al

Filing 42

ORDER granting 36 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Stefanie L. Burt for WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 9/19/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 9/4/2018. (JDR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION WBI ENERGY TRANSMISSION, INC., Plaintiff, CV 18-88-BLG-SPW-TJC ORDER vs. SUBSURFACE EASEMENTS FOR THE STORAGE OF NATURAL GAS IN THE JUDITH RIVER SUBTERRANEAN GEOLOGICAL FORMATION, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff moves for the admission of Stefanie L. Burt to practice before this Court in this case with Harlan B. Krogh to act as local counsel. Ms. Burt’s application appears to be in order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to admit Stefanie L. Burt pro hac vice is GRANTED on the condition that Ms. Burt shall do her own work. This means that Ms. Burt must do her own writing, sign her own pleadings, motions, and briefs, and appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court’s electronic filing system (“CM-ECF”). Further information is available on the Court’s website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk’s Office. Ms. Burt may move for the admission pro hac vice of one (1) associate of her firm. Such associate, if duly admitted, shall be authorized to participate in this case on the same terms and conditions as Ms. Burt. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Ms. Burt, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a pleading acknowledging her admission under the terms set forth above. DATED this 4th day of September, 2018. _______________________________ TIMOTHY J. CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?