Jones v. Berryhill

Filing 25

ORDER granting 24 Motion for Attorney Fees. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A), the Court authorizes payment of attorneys fees in the amount of $16,388.50 to Plaintiffs attorney, Frederick J. Daley, Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 6/24/2021. (HEG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION BRENDAN J. JONES, Plaintiff, vs. CV 19-44-BLG-TJC ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. Petitioner, Frederick J. Daley, Jr., counsel for Plaintiff Brendan J. Jones, has filed an Unopposed Petition for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). (Doc. 24.) Mr. Daley requests attorney fees in the amount of $16,388.50. The Commissioner has no objection to the Petition. On October 6, 2020, the Court remanded this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 20.) Plaintiff subsequently prevailed on remand, and was awarded total past-due benefits in the amount of $65,554.00. (Doc. 24 at ¶ 2.) The Social Security Administration withheld $16,388.50, which represents 25% of the award, for the direct payment of attorney fees. (Doc. 24-1 at 3-5.) The Social Security Contingent Fee Contract between Plaintiff and Mr. Daley, as well as the governing law, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A), limit the recovery of attorney fees to no more than 25% of past-due benefits. The Court finds the $16,388.50 award is within the 25% limit imposed under the fee agreement and §406(b)(1)(A). The Court further finds that the award is reasonable. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the relief requested in the Petition is GRANTED. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A), the Court authorizes payment of attorney’s fees in the amount of $16,388.50 to Plaintiff’s attorney, Frederick J. Daley, Jr. DATED this 24th day of June, 2021. _______________________________ TIMOTHY J. CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?