Jones v. Berryhill
Filing
5
ORDER granting 4 Motion Frederick Daley, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 5/15/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 4/30/2019. (JDR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BILLINGS DIVISION
BRENDAN J. JONES,
CV 19-44-BLG-SPW-TJC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
Plaintiff moves for the admission of Frederick Daley, Jr. to practice before
this Court in this case with Charles E. Hansberry to act as local counsel. Mr.
Daley’s application appears to be in order, with the exception that Mr. Daley did
not provide his telephone number, fax or email contact information as required by
Local Rule 83.1(d)(3)(A).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to admit
Frederick J. Daley, Jr. pro hac vice is GRANTED on the condition that Mr. Daley
shall do his own work. This means that Mr. Daley must do his own writing, sign
his own pleadings, motions, and briefs, and appear and participate personally.
Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court’s electronic filing system (“CMECF”). Further information is available on the Court’s website,
www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk’s Office. Mr. Daley may move for the
admission pro hac vice of one (1) associate of his firm. Such associate, if duly
admitted, shall be authorized to participate in this case on the same terms and
conditions as Mr. Daley.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless
Mr. Daley, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a pleading
acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above. Mr. Daley shall also
provide his telephone, fax, and email contact information.
DATED this 30th day of April, 2019.
_______________________________
TIMOTHY J. CAVAN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?