Lashley v. Saul et al

Filing 22

ORDERED: The Commissioners final decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings, a new hearing, and a new decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 450(g). See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 11/20/2020. (HEG)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-00048-TJC Document 22 Filed 11/20/20 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION SALLY MARIE LASHLEY, CV 20-48-BLG-TJC Plaintiff, ORDER vs. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. Based upon the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 21), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Commissioner’s final decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings, a new hearing, and a new decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 450(g). See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). On remand to the Commissioner of Social Security for a de novo hearing, the Commissioner will direct the Administrative Law Judge to reconsider the medical opinions, including the opinions of Dr. Nichol and Ms. Lyson; reconsider the claimant’s residual functional capacity; reconsider the claimant’s credibility; reconsider whether the claimant met a Listing; reconsider whether the claimant can perform her past relevant work or other work in the national economy; if necessary, to obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert; and to issue a Case 1:20-cv-00048-TJC Document 22 Filed 11/20/20 Page 2 of 2 new decision. The claimant shall have the opportunity to submit new evidence and make new arguments. Upon proper application, Plaintiff may seek an award of reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). DATED this 20th day of November, 2020. _______________________________ TIMOTHY J. CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?