Beyer et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Ms. Evans, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a pleading acknowledging her admission under the terms set forth above. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 5/27/2020. (HEG)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-00051-SPW-TJC Document 8 Filed 05/27/20 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION MICHAEL DORAN, et al, CV 20-51-BLG-SPW-TJC Plaintiffs, ORDER vs. PORCH.COM INC., a Delaware corporation; et al., Defendants. Plaintiffs move for the admission of Rebecca Evans to practice before this Court in this case with Briana Smith to act as local counsel. (Doc. 7.) Ms. Evans’s application appears to be in order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion to admit Rebecca Evans pro hac vice is GRANTED on the condition that Ms. Evans shall do her own work. This means that Ms. Evans must do her own writing, sign her own pleadings, motions, and briefs, and appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court’s electronic filing system (“CMECF”). Further information is available on the Court’s website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk’s Office. Ms. Evans may move for the admission pro hac vice of one (1) associate of her firm. Such associate, if duly Case 1:20-cv-00051-SPW-TJC Document 8 Filed 05/27/20 Page 2 of 2 admitted, shall be authorized to participate in this case on the same terms and conditions as Ms. Evans. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Ms. Evans, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a pleading acknowledging her admission under the terms set forth above. DATED this 27th day of May, 2020. _______________________________ TIMOTHY J. CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?