Cantu v. Eagle Cliff Manor et al
Filing
8
ORDERED: Cantus motion for extension of time (Doc. 7) is GRANTED. Cantu may respond to the Order of October 2 (Doc. 5) on or before December 18, 2020. Copy mailed to Cantu. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 11/18/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint Form) (HEG)
Case 1:20-cv-00090-SPW-TJC Document 8 Filed 11/18/20 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BILLINGS DIVISION
JAVIER SOTELO CANTU,
Cause No. CR 20-90-BLG-SPW-TJC
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
EAGLE CLIFF MANOR; SHAWNA
BOATMAN; SYNERTX,
Defendants.
On October 2, 2020, the Court permitted Plaintiff Cantu to explain his
claims in more detail. See Order (Doc. 5). Cantu now seeks an extension of time
to respond. See Mot. (Doc. 7) at 1.
The request is reasonable and will be granted. The Court notes, however,
that Cantu states he needs additional time to “submit all the evidence needed.” Id.
Cantu does not need to submit evidence at this time, and the Court will not review
evidence to find Cantu’s claims for him.
Cantu must explain his claims in writing and in his own words by
responding to the issues and questions the Court raised. See Order (Doc. 5) at 2–5
¶¶ A–D.
1
Case 1:20-cv-00090-SPW-TJC Document 8 Filed 11/18/20 Page 2 of 2
Based on the foregoing, the Court enters the following:
ORDER
1. Cantu’s motion for extension of time (Doc. 7) is GRANTED. Cantu may
respond to the Order of October 2 (Doc. 5) on or before December 18, 2020.
2. For Cantu’s convenience, the clerk will include a form amended
complaint with his service copy of this Order.
Cantu must immediately notify the Court of any change in his mailing
address by filing a “Notice of Change of Address.” Failure to do so may result in
dismissal of the case without notice to him.
DATED this 18th day of November, 2020.
/s/ Timothy J. Cavan
Timothy J. Cavan
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?