Portland General Electric Company et al v. NorthWestern Corporation et al
ORDER granting 41 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Gregory Miller; granting 42 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Harry Schneider. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 6/18/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto on 6/3/2021. (APP)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC
CORPORATION; PACIFICORP; and
PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC.,
TALEN MONTANA, LLC; AUSTIN
KNUDSEN, in his official capacity as
Attorney General for the State of
Plaintiff Puget Sound Energy, Inc. moves for the admission of Harry H.
Schneider and Gregory F. Miller to practice before this Court in this case with
Charles E. Hansberry to act as local counsel. (Docs. 41, 42.) Mr. Schneider and
Mr. Miller’s applications appear to be in order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions to admit
Mr. Schneider and Mr. Miller pro hac vice are GRANTED on the condition that
Mr. Schneider and Mr. Miller shall do their own work. This means that Mr.
Schneider and Mr. Miller must do their own writing, sign their own pleadings,
motions, and briefs, and appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take
steps to register in the Court’s electronic filing system (“CM-ECF”). Further
information is available on the Court’s website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from
the Clerk’s Office.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless
Mr. Schneider and Mr. Miller, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order,
files a pleading acknowledging their admission under the terms set forth above.
All Plaintiffs in this case are advised that the Court will not entertain
any additional pro hac vice applications submitted on behalf of Plaintiffs
absent a showing of exceptional circumstances.
DATED this 3rd day of June, 2021.
Kathleen L. DeSoto
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?