Avista Corporation et al v. NorthWestern Corporation et al
Filing
53
ORDER granting #51 Motion for J. David Jackson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless the Applicant Attorney, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a pleading acknowledging admission under the terms set forth above. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 9/9/2021. (HEG)
Case 1:21-cv-00090-SPW-TJC Document 53 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BILLINGS DIVISION
AVISTA CORPORATION; PUGET
SOUND ENERGY, INC.;
PACIFICORP; and PORTLAND
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
CV 21-90-BLG-SPW-TJC
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
vs.
NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION
and TALEN MONTANA, LLC
Defendants.
Defendant NorthWestern Corporation moves for the admission of J. David
Jackson (“Applicant Attorney”) to practice before this Court in this case with
Steven D. Bell to act as local counsel. (Doc. 51.) The Applicant Attorney’s
application appears to be in order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s motion is
GRANTED on the condition that the Applicant Attorney shall do their own work.
This means that the Applicant Attorney must write and sign their own pleadings,
motions, and briefs, and appear and participate personally. The Applicant
Attorney shall take steps to register in the Court’s electronic filing system (“CMECF”). Further information is available on the Court’s website,
www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk’s Office.
Case 1:21-cv-00090-SPW-TJC Document 53 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless
the Applicant Attorney, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a
pleading acknowledging admission under the terms set forth above.
DATED this 9th day of September, 2021.
_______________________________
TIMOTHY J. CAVAN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?