Avista Corporation et al v. NorthWestern Corporation et al

Filing 53

ORDER granting 51 Motion for J. David Jackson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless the Applicant Attorney, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a pleading acknowledging admission under the terms set forth above. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 9/9/2021. (HEG)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-00090-SPW-TJC Document 53 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION AVISTA CORPORATION; PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC.; PACIFICORP; and PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY CV 21-90-BLG-SPW-TJC ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION and TALEN MONTANA, LLC Defendants. Defendant NorthWestern Corporation moves for the admission of J. David Jackson (“Applicant Attorney”) to practice before this Court in this case with Steven D. Bell to act as local counsel. (Doc. 51.) The Applicant Attorney’s application appears to be in order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s motion is GRANTED on the condition that the Applicant Attorney shall do their own work. This means that the Applicant Attorney must write and sign their own pleadings, motions, and briefs, and appear and participate personally. The Applicant Attorney shall take steps to register in the Court’s electronic filing system (“CMECF”). Further information is available on the Court’s website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk’s Office. Case 1:21-cv-00090-SPW-TJC Document 53 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless the Applicant Attorney, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a pleading acknowledging admission under the terms set forth above. DATED this 9th day of September, 2021. _______________________________ TIMOTHY J. CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?