Wonder Ranch v USA et al

Filing 137

ORDER denying 37 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 38 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 44 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 78 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 81 Motion in Limine No. 1 and 2, No. 3 withdrawn; denying 83 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 88 Motion to Strike denying 90 Motion to Strike Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 2/5/2016. (DED, )

Download PDF
FILED FEB 05 2016 Clerk, U.S. District Court District Of Montana Helena IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION WONDER RANCH, LLC, Plaintiff, No. CV 14-57-BU-SEH vs. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, acting through the U.S. Forest Service, and Melany Glossa, in her capacity as Supervisor of the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, Defendants. Upon the record made in open court on February 4, 2016: ORDERED: 1. Wonder Ranch, LLC's Rule 56 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Its Quiet Title Claim 1 was DENIED. 1 Doc. 37. -1- 2. Wonder Ranch, LLC's Rule 56 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendants' Counterclaims2 was DENIED. 3. Wonder Ranch, LLC's Rule 56 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Forest Service's Prescriptive Easement Counterclaim3 was DENIED. 4. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment4 was DENIED. 5. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, 5 treated for disposition as a motion for summary judgment, was DENIED. 6. Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Report and Testimony of Daniel Gallacher6 was DENIED. 7. Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Report and Testimony of Kenneth Jenkins 7 was DENIED. 2 Doc. 38. 3 Doc. 83. 4 Doc. 78. 5 Doc. 44. 6 Doc. 88. 7 Doc. 90. -2- 8. Wonder Ranch, LLC's Motions in Limine Nos. 1-3: 8 a. Motion in Limine No. 1 was DENIED. b. Motion in Limine No. 2 was DENIED. c. Motion in Limine No. 3 was WITHDRAWN. DATED this Ay of February, 2016. United States District Judge 8 Doc. 81. -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?