United States of America v. Katz et al
ORDER. (SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS) Upon review of the materials provided by cnsl, the Court has concluded that minimally appropriate disclosures were made by all parties notwithstanding the failure of all counsel to comply with the Court's Order setting the preliminary pretrial conference. The matter has been appropriately addressed. Further action is not required. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 3/3/2017. (ELL)
MAR 0 J 2017
Clerk, U.S. District Court
District Of Montana
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.,
No. CV 14-68-BU-SEH
KRISTEN NEWMAN and
MONTANA FAIR HOUSING, INC.,
JACLYN KATZ, ALL REAL
ESTATE SERVICES IN MONTANA,
ORLEANS ASSOCIATION, INC.,
and UPTOWN CONDOMINIUM
OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,
At the status conference of February 24, 2017, the Court instructed counsel
for all parties to submit copies of their Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l )(A)(i) initial
disclosures and declarations directed to issues which were not provided, as
ordered, in the parties' preliminary pretrial statements filed February 18, 2015, 1
and February 19, 2015. 2
Documents in compliance with the Court's order were filed by Kathryn
Ledewski on behalf of the United States, 3 by Kevin Brown on behalf of Kristen
Newman, 4 by Timothy Kelly on behalf of Montana Fair Housing, 5 and by David
Gallik on behalf of Defendants. 6
Upon review of the materials provided by counsel, the Court has concluded
that minimally appropriate disclosures were made by all parties notwithstanding
the failure of all counsel to comply with the Court's Order setting the preliminary
Doc. 12 (Montana Fair Housing); Doc. 13 (Kristen Newman).
Doc. 14 (Defendants); Doc. 18 (United States).
pretrial conference. 7 The matter has been appropriately addressed. Further action is
31!:/aay ofMarch, 2017.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?