Tolliver-McGregor v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana, Inc.
Filing
93
ORDERED: Defendant's motions, Docs. 83, 85, 86, 87, and 88, are DENIED without prejudice for failure to comply with L.R. 7.l(c)(l) and (d)(l )(A). Amended motions and supporting documents may be filed in compliance with the rules of this Court. If any of the motions are refiled, the responding party will have the time allotted under L.R. 7.l(d)(l)(B) in which to respond. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 2/20/2019. (HEG)
2/20/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BUTTE DIVISION
WENDY TOLLIVER-MCGREGOR,
Plaintiff,
No. CV-16-58-BU-SEH
vs.
ORDER
HEAL TH CARE SERVICE
CORPORATION, an Illinois mutual
legal reserve company d/b/a in
Montana as Blue Cross and Blue
Shield of Montana,
Defendant.
On February 15, 20 I 9, Defendant Health Care Service Corporation
("Defendant") moved with supporting briefs and documents: (I) Defendant's
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 1; (2) Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude
Evidence Not Before BCBSMT When It Made Its Determination That Plaintiffs
In-Patient Rehabilitation Stay at Craig Hospital Was Not Medically Necessary 2;
1
Doc. 83.
2
Doc. 85.
(3) Motion in Limine No. 2 to Exclude Evidence Regarding Financial Hardship 3;
(4) Defendant's Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude References to Prior Judicial
Opinions Regarding Dr. Howard Choi4; and (5) Defendant's Motion to Exclude
the Expert Testimony of Gregory Munro and Cori Cook. 5 The motions did not
indicate compliance with L.R. 7.1 (c)(1 ).
ORDERED:
1.
Defendant's motions, Docs. 83, 85, 86, 87, and 88, are DENIED
without prejudice for failure to comply with L.R. 7.l(c)(l) and (d)(l )(A).
2.
Amended motions and supporting documents may be filed in
compliance with the rules of this Court.
3.
If any of the motions are refiled, the responding party will have
the time allotted under L.R. 7.l(d)(l)(B) in which to respond.
DATED this
+'
,l,!J '
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?