United States of America v. Nineteen Firearms and 539 Rounds of Multi-Caliber Ammunition
Filing
25
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, DEFAULT JUDGMENT, ANDORDER OF FORFEITURE. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 1/30/2018. (APP)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONT ANA
BUTTE DIVISION
FILED
JAN 3 O 2018
e ,
ourt
District Of Montana
Helena
UNITED ST ATES OF AMERICA,
CV 16-64-BU-SEH
Plaintiff,
vs.
TWENTY FIREARMS AND 539
ROUNDS OF MULTI-CALIBER
AMMUNITION,
FINDINGS OF FACT,
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND
ORDER OF FORFEITURE
Defendants.
Plaintiff, the United States of America, has moved for an entry of default
judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). Upon considering the pleadings
filed herein, the Court hereby makes the following Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. On January 23, 2017, Plaintiff, United States of America, filed in this
cause its Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (Doc. 2) against the
defendant firearms and ammunition, consisting of the following property involved
in a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(l ), and I 8 U.S.C. § 922(a)( I )(A), and subject
to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d):
1.
DPMS INC. (Defense Procurement MFG. Services) Al5 Rifle
CAL:223 SN:FH194471;
2.
Gunwerks LLC LR-1000 Rifle CAL:.22-243 SN:C2463;
3.
Remington Arms Company, INC. 700 AAC-SD Rifle CAL:308
SN:G7060562;
4.
Remington Anns Company, INC. 700 Rifle CAL:300
SN:S6582620;
5.
Savage 111 Rifle CAL:300 SN:1070548;
6.
Remington Arms Company, Inc., 700 LH Rifle CAL:270
SN:A6827688;
7.
Ruger Mini 14RanchRifleRifleCAL:223 SN:187-00787;
8.
Stiller's Precision Firearm, LLC (SPF) 8-23 Rifle CAL: 6.5
Creedmore SN:PTG0106;
9.
Browning X-Bolt Rifle CAL: 6.5 Creedmore SN:32978ZV354;
I 0. Winchester 70 Sporter Rifle CAL: 22-250 SN:G208 l 542;
11. Noble MFG. CO. 70D Shotgun CAL:410 SN: None;
12. Smith & Wesson 657 Revolver CAL:41 SN:BHB5068;
13. Heckler and Koch P2000SK Pistol CAL:40 SN: 122-018076;
14. Smith & Wesson M&P 40 Pistol CAL:40 SN:CPD!6!6;
15. Smith & Wesson M&P 40C Pistol CAL:40 SN:DWS0526;
16. Stiller's Precision Firearm, LLC (SPF) TAC338 GS Receiver
CAL: Unknown SN:TB31044;
17. Browning A-Bolt Rifle CAL:300 SN:36307MZ351;
2
18. TIKKA (OY TIKKAKOSKI AB) T3 Rifle CAL:22-250
SN:J99220;
19. Winchester 70 Rifle CAL:300 SN:G2461760;
20. Shadow OPS Weaponry, LLC SHDW-15B Rifle CAL: Unknown
SN: l SB-4613.
Ammunition: 514 rounds of assorted multi-caliber ammunition; 19
rounds Smith & Wesson 40-caliber ammunition; and 6 rounds
Speer 40-caliber ammunition.
2. The Court issued a Warrant of Arrest in Rem (Doc. 7) and the defendant
property was arrested on February 8, 2017. (Doc. 8).
3. Examination of the Court files and records in this case shows that
pursuant to Rule G( 4)(b)(v) of the Supplemental Rules of Admiralty or Maritime
Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, the United States provided "direct notice" of
this forfeiture proceeding on January 27, 2017, by USPS First Class mail and
Certified mail to all known potential claimants: Nolan Barbisan, Chris Kleppen,
Danica Lewis, Michael McAulliffe, Mitchell Urdahl, Robert Wilkes, William
Lewis, Patrick Pardy, Edward Wasson, Dennis Griffin, and Linda Metcalf, Dustin
Butler, David Barbisan, Austin King, Linda Waliser, Sam Wood, and Dennis
Gentry, Gentry Custom LLC (Doc. 3,) to the addresses provided by law
enforcement.
3
4. The original mailings for Patrick Pardy, Edward Wasson, and William
Lewis, were returned as undeliverable as addressed. An internet search was
conducted for the current addresses and on March 3, 2017, the United States
provided "direct notice" of this forfeiture action by sending via first-class U.S.
mail and certified mail copies of the Notice to Amended Verified Complaint for
Forfeiture in Rem to Potential Claimant's New Address (Doc. 12) and Amended
Verified Complaint in Rem (Doc. 2).
5. The original mailing for Dennis Griffin was returned as undeliverable as
addressed. An internet search was conducted for Dennis Griffin's current address
and on April 14, 2017, the United States provided "direct notice" of this forfeiture
action by sending via first-class U.S. mail and certified mail copies of the Notice to
Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem to Potential Claimant's New
Address (Doc. 13) and Amended Verified Complaint in Rem (Doc. 2).
6. The original mailing for Linda Metcalf was returned as undeliverable as
addressed. An internet search was conducted for Linda Metcalf's current address
and on September 6, 2017, the United States provided "direct notice" of this
forfeiture action by sending via first-class U.S. mail and certified mail copies or the
Notice to Amended Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem to Potential
4
Claimant's New Address (Doc. 18) and Amended Verified Complaint in Rem
(Doc. 2).
7. Under Supplemental Rule G(4)(b), although the United States has a duty
to send direct notice to potential claimants; it is not required to personally serve
potential claimants. See United States v. $22,050 in US Currency, 595 F.3d 318,
320 n. l (6th Cir. 20 I 0)( explaining that in civil forfeiture cases, because claimants
are not defendants, Rule 4 regarding service of process does not apply and the
United States is required only to send notice pursuant to Rule G( 4 )(b) ).
8. The Notice of Amended Complaint for Forfeiture (Doc. 3, 12, 13, and
18) sets forth the deadlines for filing a verified claim to the defendant property, and
answer or Rule 12 motion as required by Supplemental Rules G(5)(a) and (b).
Nolan Barbisan, Chris Kleppen, Danica Lewis, Michael McAulliffe, Mitchell
Urdahl, Robert Wilkes, William Lewis, Patrick Pardy, Edward Wasson, Dennis
Griffin and Linda Metcalf, failed to file verified claims as instructed in the Notice
of Amended Complaint for Forfeiture. Nolan Barbisan, Chris Kleppen, Danica
Lewis, Michael McAulliffe, Mitchell Urdahl, Robert Wilkes, William Lewis,
Patrick Pardy, Edward Wasson, Dennis Griffin and Linda Metcalf, also failed to
file an answer or a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, within 21 days after the filing
5
of a claim as required by Supplemental Rule G(S)(b) and as instructed in the
Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture.
9. Verified Claims were received from the following:
• On April 3, 2017, a verified claim was received at the U.S. Attorney's
Office, from Dustin Butler, for the Gunwerks LLC LR- I 000 Rifle
CAL:.22-243 SN:C2463. (Doc 23, ex. I).
• On February 23, 2017, Counsel for David Barbisan, filed a Verified
Answer Objecting to Forfeiture for the Remington Arms Company,
Inc., 700 LH Rifle CAL:270 SN:A6827688; the Smith & Wesson 657
Revolver CAL:41 SN:BHB5068; and the Browning A-Bolt Rifle
CAL:300 SN:36307MZ35 l. (Doc. 11 ).
• On February 23, 20 I 7, a verified claim was received at the U.S.
Attorney's Office, from Sam Wood, for the TIKKA (OY
TIKKAKOSKI AB) T3 Rifle CAL:22-250 SN:J99220. (Doc. 23, ex.
2).
• On February 8, 2017, a verified claim was received at the U.S.
Attorney's Office, from Linda Waliser, for the Noble MFG. CO. 70D
Shotgun CAL:410 SN: None. (Doc. 23, ex. 3).
6
• On February 17, 2017, Dennis Gentry, on behalf of Gentry Custom,
LLC., filed a verified claim with the Court, for the Stiller's Precision
Firearm, LLC (SPF) TAC338 GS Receiver CAL: Unknown
SN:TB3 l 044; Browning A-Bolt Rifle CAL:300 SN:36307MZ35 l;
TIKKA (OY TIKKAKOSKI AB) T3 Rifle CAL:22-250 SN:J99220;
and the Winchester 70 Rifle CAL:300 SN:G2461760 for money owed
for work completed on each firearm. (Doc. 9).
• Austin King contacted the United States' Attorney's Office and
asserted a claim to the Ruger Mini 14 Ranch Rifle CAL:223 SN: 18700787. (Doc. 23, para. 2).
15. Service by publication of the forfeiture action pursuant to Supplemental
Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) was also provided to potential claimants, both known and
unknown, by publishing on the government's asset forfeiture web site the Notice of
Forfeiture Action for 30 consecutive days, beginning on April 19, 2017, and
ending on May 18, 2017. (See Declaration of Publication, Doc. 14-1). No claim
was filed with the Court within 60 days of the first day of publication by any
known or unknown potential claimant, as required by Supplemental Rule
G(S)(a)(ii)(B).
7
16. After the United States moved for the entry of defaults of Nolan
Barbisan, Chris Kleppen, Danica Lewis, Michael McAulliffe, Mitchell Urdahl,
Robert Wilkes, William Lewis, Patrick Pardy, Edward Wasson, Dennis Griffin and
Linda Metcalf, and unknown potential claimants, supported by Declarations (Doc.
17 and 20), the Clerk of District Court entered the defaults of known potential
claimants, Nolan Barbisan, Chris Kleppen, Danica Lewis, Michael McAulliffe,
Mitchell Urdahl, Robert Wilkes, William Lewis, Patrick Pardy, Edward Wasson,
Dennis Griffin, and unknown potential claimants on September 6, 2017. (Doc.
16). The Clerk of District Court entered the default of known potential claimant,
Linda Metcalf, on November 17, 2017 (Doc. 21).
17. Dustin Butler, Austin King, David Barbisan, Linda Waliser, Sam
Wood, and Dennis Gentry, have executed Acknowledgment of Notices that reflect
that they understand that it would be a violation of federal law to deliver, return, or
otherwise dispose of firearms or ammunition to Nolan Barbisan, or any person
residing with Nolan Barbisan, or any other person who is prohibited by State or
Federal law from owning or possessing firearms or ammunition. Dustin 13utler,
Austin King, David Barbisan, Linda Waliser, Sam Wood, and Dennis Gentry have
each signed an Acknowledgment of Notice document. (Doc. 23, ex.s 4-9).
8
18. On January 12, 2018, Dennis Gentry provided written acknowledgment
of payment in full for work completed on the TIKKA (OY TIKKAKOSKI AB) T3
Rifle CAL:22-250, SN: 199220 and the Browning A-Bolt Rifle CAL:300,
SN:3630MZ351, and released claim to said firearms. (Doc. 23, ex.s 10-11).
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Court makes the following
conclusions oflaw.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345
and 1355. The United States has filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem
to forfeit the defendant property consisting of firearms and ammunition, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 924( d)( I).
2. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1355 and 1395,
because the acts or omissions giving rise to the forfeiture occurred in and around
Bozeman, Montana, and the defendant property is located in this district.
3. The Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty or Maritime Claims and
Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern civil
forfeiture actions.
United States v. 2659 Roundhill Drive, 283 F.3d 1146, 1149
n.2 (9th Cir. 2002).
4. The Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem sets forth detailed facts to
9
support a reasonable belief that the United States will be able to meet its burden of
proof at trial as required by Supplemental Rule G(2)(f), to support probable cause,
and to provide proof by a preponderance of the evidence to seize and arrest the
defendant firearms and ammunition described in the Amended Verified Complaint.
5.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(d), any firearm or ammunition involved or used
in any violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(l) and 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(l)(A), shall be
subject to seizure and forfeiture.
6. The United States properly provided notice of this action to known
potential claimants, Nolan Barbisan, Chris Kleppen, Danica Lewis, Michael
McAulliffe, Mitchell Urdahl, Robert Wilkes, William Lewis, Patrick Pardy,
Edward Wasson, Dennis Griffin, Linda Metcalf~ Dustin Butler, David Barbisan,
Austin King, Linda Waliser, Sam Wood, and Dennis Gentry, under Rule G(4)(b)(i)
and (iii). The United States properly provided notice by publication to unknown
potential claimants under Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C). The Clerk of District Court
properly entered the defaults of known and unknown potential claimants in
accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) and Supplemental Rules A(2) and G(S).
(Doc. 16, 21).
7. The United States is entitled to default judgment and Order of forfeiture
against the following defendant firearms and ammunition and against any claims to
10
the defendant property under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(6 )(2):
1. DPMS INC. (Defense Procurement MFG. Services) Al 5 Rifle
CAL:223 SN:FH194471;
2. Remington Arms Company, INC. 700 AAC-SD Rifle CAL:308
SN:O7060562;
3. Remington Arms Company, INC. 700 Rifle CAL:300
SN:S6582620;
4. Savage 111 Rifle CAL:300 SN:J070548;
5. Stiller's Precision Firearm, LLC (SPF) B-23 Rifle CAI.: 6.5
Creedmore SN:PTG0I06;
6. Browning X-Bolt Rifle CAL: 6.5 Creedmore SN:32978ZV354;
7. Winchester 70 Sporter Rifle CAL: 22-250 SN:O2081542;
8. Heckler and Koch P2000SK Pistol CAL:40 SN: 1220-018076;
9. Smith & Wesson M&P 40 Pistol CAL:40 SN:CPD1616;
IO.Smith & Wesson M&P 40C Pistol CAL:40 SN:DWS0526; and
11.Shadow Ops Weaponry, LLC SHDW-15BRifle CAL:
Unknown, SN: 15B-4613.
Ammunition: 514 rounds of assorted multi-caliber ammunition; 19
rounds Smith & Wesson 40-caliber ammunition; and 6 rounds Speer
40-caliber ammunition.
8. The following persons are entitled to the return of firearms claimed as
follows:
• Dustin Butler is entitled the his claim for the Gunwerks LLC LR-
1000 Rifle CAL:.22-243 SN:C2463;
11
• David Barbisan is entitled to his claim for the Remington Arms
Company, Inc., 700 LH Rifle CAL:270 SN:A6827688, the Browning
A-Bolt Rifle CAL:300 SN:36307MZ351, and the Smith & Wesson
657 Revolver CAL:41 SN:BHB5068;
• Austin King is entitled to his claim for the Ruger Mini 14 Ranch
Rifle CAL:223 SN:187-00787;
• Linda Waliser is entitled to her claim for the Noble MFG. CO. 70D
Shotgun CAL:410 SN: None;
• Sam Wood is entitled to his claim for the TIKKA (OY
TIKKAKOSKI AB) T3 Rifle CAL:22-250 SN:199220; and
• Dennis Gentry is entitled to his claim for the Winchester 70 Rifle
CAL:300 SN:O2461760, and the Stiller's Precision Firearm, LLC
(SPF) TAC338 GS Receiver CAL: Unknown SN:TB31044.
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law,
IT IS ORDERED:
I. The United States is granted a default judgment and order of forfeiture
against the defendant firearms and ammunition, which are more particularly
described as follows:
12
1. DPMS INC. (Defense Procurement MFG. Services) Al 5 Rifle
CAL:223 SN:FH194471;
2. Remington Arms Company, INC. 700 AAC-SD Rifle CAL:308
SN:G7060562;
3. Remington Arms Company, INC. 700 Rifle CAL:300 SN:S6582620;
4. Savage 111 Rifle CAL:300 SN:1070548; Stiller's Precision Firearm,
LLC (SPF) B-23 Rifle CAL: 6.5 Creedmore SN:PTG0106;
5. Stiller's Precision Firearm, LLC (SPF) B-23 Rifle CAL: 6.5
Creedmore SN:PTG0106;
6. Browning X-Bolt Rifle CAL: 6.5 Creedmore SN:32978ZV354;
7. Winchester 70 Sporter Rifle CAL: 22-250 SN:G2081542;
8. Heckler and Koch P2000SK Pistol CAL:40 SN: 122-018076;
9. Smith & Wesson M&P 40 Pistol CAL:40 SN:CPDI616;
IO.Smith & Wesson M&P 40C Pistol CAL:40 SN:DWS0526;
SN :TB3 l 044;
I I .Shadow OPS Weaponry, LLC SHDW-15B Rifle CAL: Unknown
SN:15B-4613; and
Ammunition: 514 rounds of assorted multi-caliber ammunition; 19 rounds
Smith & Wesson 40-caliber ammunition; and 6 rounds Speer 40-caliber
ammunition.
2. The defendant firearms and ammunition described above, are hereby
forfeited to the United States and shall be disposed of in accordance with law.
13
3. The United States withdraws its claim for forfeiture on the following
firearms and the ATF is hereby ordered to make available for release, the
following firearms, to the following individuals:
1. Gunwerks LLC LR-1000 Rifle CAL:.22-243 SN:C2463 to Dustin
Butler;
2. Remington Arms Company, Inc., 700 LH Rifle CAL:270
SN:A6827688 to David Barbisan;
3. Smith & Wesson 657 Revolver CAL:41 SN:BHB5068 to David
Barbisan;
4. Browning A-Bolt Rifle CAL:300 SN:36307MZ35 l, to David
Barbisan;
5. Ruger Mini 14 Ranch Rifle CAL:223 SN: 187-00787 to Austin King;
6. Noble MFG. CO. 70D Shotgun CAL:410 SN: None to Linda
Waliser;
7. TIKKA (OY TIKKAKOSKI AB) T3 Rifle CAL:22-250 SN:J99220 to
Sam Wood;
8. Winchester 70 Rifle CAL:300 SN:O2461760 to Dennis Gentry; and
9. Stiller's Precision Firearm, LLC (SPF) TAC338 GS Receiver CAL:
Unknown ~~B31044, to Dennis Gentry.
DATED this~ day of~~~~-'' 2018.
United States District Judge
14
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?