John Doe v. Montana State University et al
Filing
10
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice RE Jesse R. Binnall, Esq. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 6/20/2017. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 6/6/2017. (ELL)
FILED
JUN 06 2017
Clerk, U.S. District Court
District Of Montana
Helene
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BUTTE DIVISION
JOHN DOE,
Plaintiff,
No. CV 17-15-BU-SEH
vs.
ORDER
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY,
DR. WADED CURZADO, DR.
ROBERT MOKWA, JYL SHAFFER,
JAMES SLETTEN, AND
KATHARINE KUJAWA, employees
of Montana State University, sued in
his or her official and individual
capacity, jointly and severally,
Defendants.
Plaintiff has moved for admission of Jesse R. Binnall, Esq. to practice
before this Court in this case pro hac vice with Matthew G. Monforton, Esq., of
Monforton Law Offices, PLLC, Bozeman, Montana, to act as local counsel.
Binnall's application appears to be in compliance with L.R. 83.l(d).
ORDERED:
Plaintiffs motion to allow Binnall to appear on its behalf1 is GRANTED on
the following conditions:
1.
Local counsel shall exercise the responsibilities required by
L.R. 83.l(d)(S) and must be designated as lead counsel or as co-lead counsel with
Binnall;
2.
Binnall must do his own work. He must do his own writing, sign his
own pleadings, motions, briefs and other documents served or filed by him, and, if
designated co-lead counsel, must appear and participate personally in all
proceedings before the Court;
3.
Local counsel shall also sign all such pleadings, motions and briefs,
and other documents served or filed; and
4.
Admission is personal to Binnall; it is not an admission of the Harvey
& Binnall, PLLC law firm.
FURTHER ORDERED:
This Order will be withdrawn unless Binnall, within fifteen ( 15) days from
the date of this Order, files an acknowledgment and acceptance of his admission
1
Doc. 9.
-2-
under the terms set forth above.
-r-4
DATED this _k"'-1f;;y of June, 2017.
United States District Judge
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?