Munter v. Schmidt
Filing
85
ORDER: Schmidt's remaining objections to Munter's designations of Dr. Eugene Slocum's deposition are DENIED. Munter's objections to Schmitd's designations of Dr. Eugene Slocum's deposition are DENIED. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 10/12/2018. (MMS)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BUTTE DIVISION
CV 17-21-BU-BMM
JENNIFER MUNTER a/k/a JENNY
MUNTER,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
MEAGAN SCHMIDT,
Defendant.
Plaintiff Jennifer Munter filed Deposition Designations of Depositions to be
Used as Trial Testimony on October 2, 2018. (Doc. 73.) Defendant Meagan
Schmidt stated her counter designations in the same filing as Munter. (Doc. 73-1.)
Both parties noted designations for the depositions of Dr. Eugene Slocum, Crystal
Elrod, and Rick Ridley. (Doc. 73-1.) Neither party objected to the designations of
Crystal Elrod’s deposition. (Doc. 73-1.)
Schmidt objected to 19:21-22 of Rick Ridley’s deposition. (Doc. 73-1.)
Munter did not object to Schmidt’s designations of Rick Ridley’s testimony. The
Court filed an Order on Schmidt’s Motion to Exclude Rick Ridley on October 3,
2018. (Doc. 79.) Pursuant to the Court’s Order, Munter further redacted Rick
Ridley’s testimony. Munter, through counsel, proposed her new redactions to
1
Schmidt’s counsel. Schmidt’s counsel does not object to the Munter’s new
designations. Accordingly, Schmidt’s previously stated objections are resolved.
Munter and Schmidt filed various designations of Dr. Slocum’s deposition.
Both parties also listed several objections. Schmidt objected to Dr. Slocum’s
deposition at 53:24-25. The parties agreed that 53:24-25 of Dr. Slocum’s
deposition would be redacted. Schmidt’s objection is resolved.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Schmidt’s remaining objections to Munter’s designations of Dr. Eugene
Slocum’s deposition are DENIED.
2. Munter’s objections to Schmidt’s designations of Dr. Eugene Slocum’s
deposition are DENIED.
DATED this 12th day of October, 2018.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?