Tocher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Filing 11

ORDERED: Necessary and appropriate revisions to the preliminary pretrial statements to address the deficiencies outlined in paragraphs 1 and 2 above sahll be filed on or before 8/8/17. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 8/4/2017. (ELL)

Download PDF
FILED AUG 0 4 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District Court District Of Montana Helena FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION HALEY TOCHER, Plaintiff, No. CV 17-28-BU-SEH vs. ORDER STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. On June 20, 2017, the Court set a preliminary pretrial conference for August 1 9, 2017. The June 20, 201 7, Order requires each party to file a preliminary pretrial statement, addressing with strict compliance, each matter listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(i) and (ii) and L.R. 16.2(b)(l). 2 The preliminary pretrial statements filed on July 31, 2017, fail to comply with the Court's June 20, 2017, Order. Deficiencies in the July 31, 2017, preliminary pretrial statements include: 1. Plaintiffs Preliminary Pretrial Statement3 does not address the 1 Doc.4. 2 Doc. 4 at 3. 3 Doc. 9. matters listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(ii) and required by the Court's June 20, 2017, Order. 2. Defendant State Farm Automobile Insurance Company's Preliminary Pretrial Statement4 does not: (a) include the city and state of residence of each individual known or believed to have information that may be used in proving or denying any party's claims or defenses as required under L.R. 16.2(b)(l)(J); or (b) address the matters listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(ii) and required by the Court's June 20, 2017, Order. ORDERED: Necessary and appropriate revisions to the preliminary pretrial statements to address the deficiencies outlined in paragraphs 1 and 2 above shall be filed on or United States District Judge 4 Doc. 10. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?