Tocher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Filing
11
ORDERED: Necessary and appropriate revisions to the preliminary pretrial statements to address the deficiencies outlined in paragraphs 1 and 2 above sahll be filed on or before 8/8/17. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 8/4/2017. (ELL)
FILED
AUG 0 4 2017
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Clerk, U.S. District Court
District Of Montana
Helena
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BUTTE DIVISION
HALEY TOCHER,
Plaintiff,
No. CV 17-28-BU-SEH
vs.
ORDER
STATE FARM MUTUAL
AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.,
Defendant.
On June 20, 2017, the Court set a preliminary pretrial conference for August
1
9, 2017. The June 20, 201 7, Order requires each party to file a preliminary
pretrial statement, addressing with strict compliance, each matter listed in Fed. R.
Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(i) and (ii) and L.R. 16.2(b)(l). 2 The preliminary pretrial
statements filed on July 31, 2017, fail to comply with the Court's June 20, 2017,
Order.
Deficiencies in the July 31, 2017, preliminary pretrial statements include:
1.
Plaintiffs Preliminary Pretrial Statement3 does not address the
1
Doc.4.
2
Doc. 4 at 3.
3
Doc. 9.
matters listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(ii) and required by the Court's June
20, 2017, Order.
2.
Defendant State Farm Automobile Insurance Company's Preliminary
Pretrial Statement4 does not: (a) include the city and state of residence of each
individual known or believed to have information that may be used in proving or
denying any party's claims or defenses as required under L.R. 16.2(b)(l)(J); or (b)
address the matters listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(ii) and required by the
Court's June 20, 2017, Order.
ORDERED:
Necessary and appropriate revisions to the preliminary pretrial statements to
address the deficiencies outlined in paragraphs 1 and 2 above shall be filed on or
United States District Judge
4
Doc. 10.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?