Wagner et al v. Summit Air Ambulance et al

Filing 81

ORDER granting 80 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order. Amended Pleadings due by 11/1/2018. Discovery due by 12/28/2018. Opening Brief due 1/21/19. Response brief due 2/18/19. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 5/1/2018. (NOS)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION STAN and RAINY WAGNER, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, vs. SUMMIT AIR AMBULANCE, LLC, REACH AIR MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC, and DOES I-X, Defendants. REACH AIR MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC., Counterclaim and ThirdParty Claim-Plaintiff vs. HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION d/b/a BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MONTANA and STAN AND RAINY WAGNER, Counterclaim and ThirdParty Claim Defendants ) ) Cause No. CV-17-57-BU-BMM ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED ) MOTION TO AMEND THE ) SCHEDULING ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Upon review of the Unopposed Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order submitted by counsel for Plaintiffs Stan and Rainy Wagner, the Court finds that good cause exists to grant the motion. -1- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court enters the following scheduling order dates for Plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2) and/or 3: November 1, 2018 November 19, 2018 December 3, 2018 December 28, 2018 January 21, 2019 February 18, 2019 __________________ Amendment of Pleadings and Joinder of Parties Plaintiffs’ Disclosure of Experts Regarding Class Certification Defendants’ Disclosure of Experts Regarding Class Certification Deadline for completion of discovery. Motion to certify and opening brief due. Defendants’ response brief due. Hearing on motion to certify (location TBD). DATED this 1st day of May, 2018. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?