Howard et al v. Interstate Distributor Co. et al
Filing
10
ORDERED: Plaintiffs shall file an amended preliminary pretrial statement, addressing with strict compliance each matter listed in L.R. 16.2(b)(l)(D), (F), (G), and (J) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(i) on or before May 1, 2018. Failure to file an amended preliminary pretrial statement in full compliance with the terms of this Order could result, without motion, in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/27/2018. (HEG)
FILED
APR 2 7 2018
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Clerk, U.S. District Court
District Of Montana
Helena
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONT ANA
BUTTE DIVISION
SHARON HOWARD and FRANK
HOWARD,
No. CV 18-14-BU-SEH
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ORDER
INTERSTATE DISTRIBUTOR CO.,
CHARLES BROWN, and JOHN
DOES 1 through 10,
Defendants.
The Court's Order setting this matter for preliminary pretrial conference at
11 :00 a.m. on May 3, 2018, was issued on March 21, 2018. 1
The Order required that each party's preliminary pretrial statement strictly
comply with each matter listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)( 1)(A)(i)-(iii) and L.R.
16.2(b)( 1).
1
Doc. 5.
-1-
The Plaintiffs' preliminary pretrial statement,2 filed April 24, 2018, is
deficient in at least the following particulars:
I.
It fails to comply with the disclosure requirements of L.R.
16.2(b)(l)(D), (F), (G), and (J).
2.
It fails to comply with the disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P.
26(a)(l)(A)(i).
ORDERED:
Plaintiffs shall file an amended preliminary pretrial statement, addressing
with strict compliance each matter listed in L.R. 16.2(b)(l)(D), (F), (G), and (J)
and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(i) on or before May I, 2018. Failure to file an
amended preliminary pretrial statement in full compliance with the terms of'this
Order could result, without motion, in the imposition of sanctions.
-d
DATED this,17 day of April, 2018.
~D,1~h\
United States District Judge
2
Doc. 9.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?