Howard et al v. Interstate Distributor Co. et al

Filing 10

ORDERED: Plaintiffs shall file an amended preliminary pretrial statement, addressing with strict compliance each matter listed in L.R. 16.2(b)(l)(D), (F), (G), and (J) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(i) on or before May 1, 2018. Failure to file an amended preliminary pretrial statement in full compliance with the terms of this Order could result, without motion, in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/27/2018. (HEG)

Download PDF
FILED APR 2 7 2018 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District Court District Of Montana Helena FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONT ANA BUTTE DIVISION SHARON HOWARD and FRANK HOWARD, No. CV 18-14-BU-SEH Plaintiffs, vs. ORDER INTERSTATE DISTRIBUTOR CO., CHARLES BROWN, and JOHN DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. The Court's Order setting this matter for preliminary pretrial conference at 11 :00 a.m. on May 3, 2018, was issued on March 21, 2018. 1 The Order required that each party's preliminary pretrial statement strictly comply with each matter listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)( 1)(A)(i)-(iii) and L.R. 16.2(b)( 1). 1 Doc. 5. -1- The Plaintiffs' preliminary pretrial statement,2 filed April 24, 2018, is deficient in at least the following particulars: I. It fails to comply with the disclosure requirements of L.R. 16.2(b)(l)(D), (F), (G), and (J). 2. It fails to comply with the disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(i). ORDERED: Plaintiffs shall file an amended preliminary pretrial statement, addressing with strict compliance each matter listed in L.R. 16.2(b)(l)(D), (F), (G), and (J) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(i) on or before May I, 2018. Failure to file an amended preliminary pretrial statement in full compliance with the terms of'this Order could result, without motion, in the imposition of sanctions. -d DATED this,17 day of April, 2018. ~D,1~h\ United States District Judge 2 Doc. 9. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?