Cottonwood Environmental Law Center et al v. Edwards et al
Filing
199
ORDER REGARDING TAXATION OF COSTS: Costs are allowed in the amount of $5,633.29 and disallowed in the amount of $465.00. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 9/19/2022. (SLR)
Case 2:20-cv-00028-BMM Document 199 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT
BUTTE DIVISION
COTTONWOOD
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER,
et al.,
CV-20-28-BU-BMM
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER REGARDING
TAXATION OF COSTS
BIG SKY WATER AND SEWER
DISTRICT,
Defendant.
Big Sky Water and Sewer District (“Defendant”) submitted its Bill of Costs
and supporting itemization and documentation on May 20, 2022 (Doc. 167.)
Cottonwood Environmental Law Center, et al., (“Plaintiffs”) have filed no
objections to Defendant’s Bill of Costs.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) grants trial courts the discretion to
award costs to the prevailing party in litigation. Taniguchi v. Kan Pac. Saipan,
Ltd., 566 U.S. 560, 565 (2012). Title 28 U.S.C. § 1920 limits to specific categories
the costs and fees that a trial court may tax pursuant to its authority under Rule
54(d). Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 437 (1987).
1
Case 2:20-cv-00028-BMM Document 199 Filed 09/19/22 Page 2 of 4
Generally, a “district court need not give affirmative reasons for awarding costs;
instead, it need only find that the reasons for denying costs are not sufficiently
persuasive to overcome the presumption in favor of an award. The presumption
itself provides all the reason a court needs for awarding costs.” Save Our Valley v.
Sound Transit, 335 F.3d 932, 945 (9th Cir. 2003).
Accordingly, in the absence of any objections, and based upon
documentation within the record, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), and 28
U.S.C. §§ 1821 and 1920, costs are taxed in favor of Defendant and against
Plaintiffs as outlined below.
ALLOWED COSTS AND FEES:
Witness fees
- Witness fee - Mark Cunnane
$40.00
- Witness fee - Scott Buecker
$40.00
- Witness fee - Ron Edwards
$40.00
- Witness fee - Terry Campbell
$40.00
- Mileage allowance - Mark Cunnane
$109.40
- Mileage allowance - Scott Buecker
$103.55
- Mileage allowance - Ron Edwards
$98.28
- Mileage allowance - Terry Campbell
$79.56
Fees for printed or electronically recorded transcripts necessarily
obtained:
$550.79
Costs for obtaining copies
$1,897.20
TOTAL
$5,633.29
2
$3,185.30
Case 2:20-cv-00028-BMM Document 199 Filed 09/19/22 Page 3 of 4
Section 1920(2) authorizes taxation of “fees for printed or electronically
recorded transcripts necessarily obtained for use in the case.” 28 U.S.C. § 1920(2).
Section 1920(4) allows taxation of costs for copies “necessarily obtained for use in
the case.” 28 U.S.C. § 1920(4). Finally, § 1821 allows witness fees in the amount
of 40.00 per witness per day, as well as mileage allowance for travel by personal
vehicle. 28 U.S.C. § 1821(b) and (c)(2). Accordingly, the Court allows the above
costs.
DISALLOWED COSTS AND FEES:
Witness Fees
- Subsistence allowance - Mark Cunnane
- Subsistence allowance - Scott Buecker
- Subsistence allowance - Ron Edwards
TOTAL
$465.00
$155.00
$155.00
$155.00
$465.00
Defendant’s listed “witness fees” include fees for subsistence for three
witnesses who testified at trial. (Doc. 167 at 2.) Section 1821 of Title 28 only
allows for subsistence when “an overnight stay is required at the place of
attendance because such place is so far removed from the residence of such witness
as to prohibit return thereto from day to day.” 28 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(1). The
witnesses here each participated in only one day of trial. Accordingly, the Court
3
Case 2:20-cv-00028-BMM Document 199 Filed 09/19/22 Page 4 of 4
will not tax to the Plaintiffs the subsistence allowance for Mark Cunnane, Scott
Buecker, and Ron Edwards. (Doc. 167 at 2.)
In conclusion, costs are allowed in the amount of $5,633.29 and disallowed
in the amount of $465.00.
DATED this 19th day of September, 2022.
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?