Cottonwood Environmental Law Center et al v. Edwards et al

Filing 42

ORDER granting 41 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Mave A. Gasaway for Big Sky Water and Sewer District,Mave A. Gasaway for Ron Edwards. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 6/18/2021. PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 6/3/2021. (Copy mailed to counsel Gasaway) (MMS)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER; MONTANA RIVERS; and GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, CV-20-28-BU-BMM ORDER v. RON EDWARDS, in his official Capacity as Manager of the Big Sky Water and Sewer District; and BIG SKY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, Defendants. Defendants have moved for an order allowing Mave A. Gasaway, Esq., to appear pro hac vice in this case with Jacqueline R. Papez, Esq., designated as local counsel. The application of Ms. Gasaway appears to be in compliance with L.R. 83.1(d). IT IS ORDERED: Defendants’ motion to allow Ms. Gasaway to appear on its behalf (Doc. 41) is GRANTED, subject to the following conditions: 1. Local counsel shall exercise the responsibilities required by L.R. 83.1(d)(5) and must be designated as lead counsel or as co-lead counsel; 2. Ms. Gasaway must do her own work. She must do her own writing, sign her own pleadings, motions, briefs, and, if designated co-lead counsel, must appear and participate personally in all proceedings before the Court; 3. Local counsel shall also sign all such pleadings, motions and briefs and other documents served or filed; and 4. Admission is personal to Ms. Gasaway not the law firm she works for. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: Ms. Gasaway must file, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order, an acknowledgment and acceptance of her admission under the terms set forth above. DATED this 3rd day of June, 2021. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?